Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

An open letter to Mike Shula


LUUUUUKE

Recommended Posts

Just now, panthers55 said:

You clearly are looking for things to complain about and you will find them if that is all you look for. Cam was very rusty early and we had to go run heavy to compensate. The second half we got things rolling. Given we should have hung 35 on them. That pass play to Ed Dickson was so set up by early throws and dumpoffs to CMC. The safety came down to cover CMC and Cam had Dickson all alone over the top. Great play call. One of many tonight. Too bad you see the same thing but have no appreciation for what you are seeing.

Yeah I watched the game in its entirety. I saw the missed TD pass to Dickson, and I beleive it was the play before Cam missed a wide open Olsen. 

Is it encouraging that CMC will command extra personnel to constantly be weary of him, thereby opening up some things offemsively? Yes it is, verymuch so.

Is it also frustrating to see other rookies outplay the #8 draft pick with as many touches as he was given? Absolutely it was. After all, what we watched in the aforementioned backs' games is exactly what we thought we'd get with CMC game one.

i have to beleive that Cam isn't anywhere near ready. If I'm wrong about that, then we're in big big trouble.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LUUUUUKE said:

Yeah I watched the game in its entirety. I saw the missed TD pass to Dickson, and I beleive it was the play before Cam missed a wide open Olsen. 

Is it encouraging that CMC will command extra personnel to constantly be weary of him, thereby opening up some things offemsively? Yes it is, verymuch so.

Is it also frustrating to see other rookies outplay the #8 draft pick with as many touches as he was given? Absolutely it was. After all, what we watched in the aforementioned backs' games is exactly what we thought we'd get with CMC game one.

i have to beleive that Cam isn't anywhere near ready. If I'm wrong about that, then we're in big big trouble.

Cam will be better next week. and better...

Cam's shoulder is rusty<---first time today) no doubt about it, and he will take time, maybe all the way to the Superbowl. But as far as a first game of the season(s) this was a good game and a conference win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jangler said:

Cam will be better next week. and better...

Cam's shoulder is rusty<---first time today) no doubt about it, and he will take time, maybe all the way to the Superbowl. But as far as a first game of the season(s) this was a good game and a conference win.

Concur with all. CMC is a force, but we have to use Olsen/KB/Funch as well.  They had 5 catches combined. How is anyone okay with this?

It pisses me off that year in and year out we have to worry about our OC putting us in a hole. 3rd and medium? KB on a slant.... I knew it, you knew it, and that LBer knew it, just couldn't catch it.

we have to become unpredictable. That's why I'm fussin. We have too much talent to be predictable. We have to get better. Refine the gameplan for next week. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, LUUUUUKE said:

Concur with all. CMC is a force, but we have to use Olsen/KB/Funch as well.  They had 5 catches combined. How is anyone okay with this?

It pisses me off that year in and year out we have to worry about our OC putting us in a hole. 3rd and medium? KB on a slant.... I knew it, you knew it, and that LBer knew it, just couldn't catch it.

we have to become unpredictable. That's why I'm fussin. We have too much talent to be predictable. We have to get better. Refine the gameplan for next week. 

Would I like for the offense to run more smoothly yes.  But I also can't put the blame on the OC for things that he can't control.  Such as, he can't make Cam Newton throw to wide open Greg Olsens.  Olsen was open a few times today and Cam didn't get him the ball.  KB/Funch get about as much separation as a fat girl thighs.  People play 7 yards off the ball and there is nothing they can do.   We could have easily scored 37-40 points with a little better execution by the "PLAYERS".   If my OC is getting me 30+ points WTF would i complain about? 

In conclusion: 

So some of us don't want to blame Shula for 

1. Making Cam miss open reads and open receivers. 

2. Cam not forcing the ball into tight coverage because our WR's still can't get separation. 

3. Disregard a concerted effort to involved CMC.  Especially since if we didn't most of you would be complaining he didn't get enough touches. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/8/2017 at 9:04 AM, LUUUUUKE said:

The Chiefs drafted an absolute Beast in the 3rd round.

To think, if Spencer Ware doesn't go down, he would have been used as a change of pace back behind him.

I seriously doubt that CMC will get anywhere close to 246 yds from scrimmage (a new NFL record for a rookie in his first game) but I sure hope he does

 

You did sweet his burst on punt return, running, and receiving right? I wouldn't be surprised if he has a 100 yard receiving and rushing day this year. The problem is he is also splitting targets with several other players including another running back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, LUUUUUKE said:

Concur with all. CMC is a force, but we have to use Olsen/KB/Funch as well.  They had 5 catches combined. How is anyone okay with this?

It pisses me off that year in and year out we have to worry about our OC putting us in a hole. 3rd and medium? KB on a slant.... I knew it, you knew it, and that LBer knew it, just couldn't catch it.

we have to become unpredictable. That's why I'm fussin. We have too much talent to be predictable. We have to get better. Refine the gameplan for next week. 

The problem wasn't Shula at all, on most plays we had guys open. It was about Cam shaking off the rust and getting up to game speed with his decision making and defensive reading. Given he made 2 passes all preseason and had little to no work on a surgically repaired shoulder I thought he did great. I am glad we played SF. Would we have struggled against a great defense? Yep. But we are 1-0 and will improve as we go. I though Cam checking down and taking what the defense gave him was great. A far cry from typical which was trying to do too much.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/8/2017 at 8:54 AM, LUUUUUKE said:

Dear Mike,

 

If ever you are confused on how to properly employ CMC, please throw in that tape of the Kansas City Chiefs against the the Pats. You should pay especially close attention to where they line up #25 Kareem Hunt. There is no excuse for CMC not to have similar success all season long.

We are not interested in hearing how everything takes time to gel. Make it happen!

 

Sincerely,

#PantherNation

This is an unreasonable position. So basically your belief is if CMC doesn't perform it isn't on him at all it's on Shula. Everyone here was worried Shula wouldn't get CMC the ball, when he does and CMC doesn't ball out you guys blame Shula. I'm pretty sure that's what you call bias. 

Shula had nothing to do with CMC dancing and fumbling. I'm hopeful he'll have a better game 2 and improve as the season goes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just chasing targets is a fools game. Chase averaged 85 yrds and .76 TDs per game his first year and 87.16 yrds, and .75 TD's per game his second year. Statistically the same. NOT an improvement. Puka saw no increase either. Yes, Waddle's went down because he had to share targets with another receiver - just like TMac will have to share targets with Coker next year so you have actually just made my point concerning Coker. Olave saw an increase in targets but Carr replaced Dalton and even with the increase in targets, his production was pretty flat (83 extra yards and 1 more TD for the entire year). And Wilson's number did increase but the Jets replaced the other two receivers and their contribution was significantly down from Davis's and Moore's. Again, nothing in those numbers should lead anyone to believe there will be a big leap for Tmac next year.       
    • See my previous post. You're also leaving out that T-Mac was likely hitting a rookie wall, like 95% of rookies do late in their first season, combined with the added attention on him by defenses, which in turn would be why Bryce looked Coker's way down the stretch.  With Coker playing like that to start next year, defenses will have to pay attention to it, which will then also make things easier for T-Mac. All of which is also ignoring that T-Mac will just be a better player next year than he was this year, assuming he works on his game this offseason, which we all know he will be.  If a player who was already your clear cut #1 comes back even better his next season, you're going to make sure you're throwing it his way more often, no matter who else you have. Again, Coker's added targets won't be at the expense of T-Mac's, they will BOTH be taking targets from the rest of the team.  Not to mention, we should be passing it more next year to begin with, seeing as we'll have both of them hopefully ready to go full speed Week 1, which again, will help both their target totals increase. Coker looks like a really good player, but even the most optimistic person can't say he looks like he has #1 potential, he has very solid to maybe even high end #2 potential.  You're not taking targets away from the reigning OROY who looks like a true Top 15 WR already to get your #2 targets, you increase both of them by taking from the others.
    • Need to crush the hawks tonight. A lose would really damage momentum 
×
×
  • Create New...