Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Could Devin Funchess Be The WR1 This Franchise Has Been Looking For?


Saca312

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

No. Too raw as a WR. We need a real WR. A vet. One who can come in and reliably produce from day one. 

Sammy Watkins, if he remained healthy, would be the best WR Cam has ever had outside of 2011 Steve Smith by a long shot. We would be lucky to have him. He’s been tearing it up lately this season. 

 

You mean to tell me Sammy Watkins isn’t a “real WR”? What? We are talking about the same person right? His only question has been his health. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, OnlyPantherFaninMaine said:

Sammy Watkins, if he remained healthy, would be the best WR Cam has ever had outside of 2011 Steve Smith by a long shot. We would be lucky to have him. He’s been tearing it up lately this season. 

 

You mean to tell me Sammy Watkins isn’t a “real WR”? What? We are talking about the same person right? His only question has been his health. 

No, I've gone completely crazy. I was thinking about Curtis Samuel, not Sammy Watkins. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, OnlyPantherFaninMaine said:

Somehow, despite be efforts of Gettleman to get some receivers around him, we still have a bottom 2-3 WR corps in the league. 

I never liked the way Gettleman evaluated "wide receivers". He drafted guys who fit the physical mold of what he wanted in a WR but was all too willing to overlook just how damn raw at actually playing the position that the guys he was adding truly were. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, OnlyPantherFaninMaine said:

Somehow, despite be efforts of Gettleman to get some receivers around him, we still have a bottom 2-3 WR corps in the league. 

I really doubt he tried that hard. DJAX and Jeffrey were available at cheap. We didn't even offer. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I realize it about the expectations, but on paper, we drafted players who would have a chance to compete at positions where any could realistically step in and take the job---Freeling?  Yup.  Hunter?  Yup.  Brazzell?  Yup.  It is likely that all three see the field early and often.  Day 3:  Lee?  I see him as the #3 CB and the job is his when they are ready for him--and it is his to lose.  Hecht?  I loved him in mock research and called him the best C in the draft.  He might play a year behind Fortson or he could take the job--regardless, he is the obvious front runner for the 2027 season.  Wheatley?  I see Ransom and Moehrig as basically the same "in the box" type S.  If Wheatley can learn for a season behind Scott, he has the tools to be a serviceable FS, something this team needs.  Finally, Kuwatch seemed to be a PS pick, and he could be--but to win the 4th ILB job, he needs to beat out Bam Morris-Scott and with a 46.5 vertical (I can't do that on the triple jump) and a superior RAS rating, he looks like a special teamer and depth piece.....I forgot about Morgan's comment about giving up the 5th--probably to get ahead of Detroit.  Freeling has the athleticism and the tools to be the best OT in this draft.  The others lacked arm length or something like that--Freeling simply lacks a ton of experience. 
    • excellent points and insights.  I agree on Tepper.  I guess I worry that his questions and comments might influence the thinking of his employees, that his presence in the room might add pressure to an already stressful situation, but after watching it again, it does not appear to be like that.  Morgan was in charge.  Canales mentioned needing a center, but beyond that, he was there to serve as a consultant, more or less, if asked.  I suppose my point was this--everyone knew their roles, I did not see egos--I saw empowerment.  As for Morgan--I saw a leader that listened to others, made wise decisions, and never lost control.  I was VERY IMPRESSED with Dan Morgan. 
    • Pretty good summation, although I would caution just a bit that there might be a little of over-enhanced expectations. I do agree with the assessment on BPA. It was exceedingly clear they had a specific shopping list. Early on when there was some discussion about the tackles available, Morgan was asked if he was willing to give up a 5th to get Freeling, if it came to that. I think the only way it wasn't a left tackle with that 1st pick is if none that were valued as a 1st were still available.
×
×
  • Create New...