Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If they trade Kemba..


WOW!!

Recommended Posts

44 minutes ago, bLACKpANTHER said:

Reading between the lines: we didnt make any significant moves because we are waiting on Mitch to get here and fix things.. Cho wasn't allowed to pull the trigger becus he is a lame duck - or just a plain old lame..

Either way - now i can buy my tix for when they come to DC

Jordan wouldn't let him pull any trades involving Kemba unless the Hornets got back a kings ransom. Like young players, draft picks and an all-star coming back plus a team willing to take Batum in the trade. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, carpanfan96 said:

Cavs kept going even after they traded IT. It was with a different package, not sure if the bkn pick was included but from what I've seen it was and it might've included Love as well. 

Yeah, CAvs were trying to fleece MJ. Didn’t happen. Good. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, carpanfan96 said:

Jordan wouldn't let him pull any trades involving Kemba unless the Hornets got back a kings ransom. Like young players, draft picks and an all-star coming back plus a team willing to take Batum in the trade. 

I think the Cavs were trying to fleece, and not include the Brooklyn pick. No way any trade should’ve been made unless that pick was in it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/8/2018 at 4:29 PM, bLACKpANTHER said:

Reading between the lines: we didnt make any significant moves because we are waiting on Mitch to get here and fix things.. Cho wasn't allowed to pull the trigger becus he is a lame duck - or just a plain old lame..

Either way - now i can buy my tix for when they come to DC

Cool I like that plan better.. Get some different GM eyes on the situation before we trade our best player. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...