Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Oscar Nominations


Shocker

Recommended Posts

A few oscar movies I've seen recently...no spoilers

The Shape of Water - I liked it but strange and the stories been done before but interesting and great acting.

Three billboards outside Ebbing Missouri - off beat and a little of everything here.  Really liked it.  Funny parts and some great acting in this one.

Dunkirk...meh, I turned it off.  Maybe I will try again later but didnt like it.

Saw Get Out way back and its really good and I think has a real chance to win.  Still I think Three BBs will take it from what Ive seen.

Another one to check out on Netflix is Mudbound.  Good movie.

Lastly, I would say I was somewhat disappointed with Blade Runner 2049.  My expectations were sky high but I would call it good.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dunkirk is fantastic for editing, and audio, and all that, but overall as a movie, I found it very overrated.    Was probably better in theater as well but when we're looking at Oscar nominations, I would think you want some good ACTING in there.    Not that it was BAD acting, there just wasn't very much of it (dialog).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have yet to see Phantom Thread, The Post, or I, Tonya.  But from what I have seen I would vote for

Best Picture: The Shape of Water
It seems to be the favorite and I hope it wins but I could see voters awarding del Toro and then trying to make some political statement here (I know, shocking).  The have both Get Out and Lady Bird (heavily female cast and female director...#metoo!) to choose from.  Nothing against either, enjoyed them, but they are not best picture.  ***I would have voted for Wind River over any of the nominated films***

Best Director: Guillermo del Toro
I actually think he is going to win.  He should have won for Pan’s Labryinth (the film should have won too) and I will be really excited to see him get the award.

Best Actor: Gary Oldman (Darkest Hour)
This is the most sure thing, has to win for me this year.  Luckily, like Casey Affleck last year, it seems it will happen.  I honestly think the film itself should be higher up in the competition for Best Picture compared to some of the other challengers.

Best Actress: Sally Hawkins (The Shape of Water)
I have no strong conviction here.  I have seen three nominees and Would not argue against any of them, they were all amazing in their different ways.  McDormand is going to win, and it does not really upset me.  She was great.  Ronan was great also.  I have not even see the other two nominees so they may be better than all three.  

Best Supporting Actor: Sam Rockwell (Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri)
Again, I do not have very strong feelings on this one.  Rockwell is the best of the three I have seen, but he is not so great that I would be upset if he lost.

Best Supporting Actress: Laurie Metcalf (Lady Bird)
It seems as if Janney is going to win.  I have not seen her performance so at this point I cannot criticize that choice if they go that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Goondal said:

I have yet to see Phantom Thread, The Post, or I, Tonya.  But from what I have seen I would vote for

Best Picture: The Shape of Water
It seems to be the favorite and I hope it wins but I could see voters awarding del Toro and then trying to make some political statement here (I know, shocking).  The have both Get Out and Lady Bird (heavily female cast and female director...#metoo!) to choose from.  Nothing against either, enjoyed them, but they are not best picture.  ***I would have voted for Wind River over any of the nominated films***

Best Director: Guillermo del Toro
I actually think he is going to win.  He should have won for Pan’s Labryinth (the film should have won too) and I will be really excited to see him get the award.

Best Actor: Gary Oldman (Darkest Hour)
This is the most sure thing, has to win for me this year.  Luckily, like Casey Affleck last year, it seems it will happen.  I honestly think the film itself should be higher up in the competition for Best Picture compared to some of the other challengers.

Best Actress: Sally Hawkins (The Shape of Water)
I have no strong conviction here.  I have seen three nominees and Would not argue against any of them, they were all amazing in their different ways.  McDormand is going to win, and it does not really upset me.  She was great.  Ronan was great also.  I have not even see the other two nominees so they may be better than all three.  

Best Supporting Actor: Sam Rockwell (Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri)
Again, I do not have very strong feelings on this one.  Rockwell is the best of the three I have seen, but he is not so great that I would be upset if he lost.

Best Supporting Actress: Laurie Metcalf (Lady Bird)
It seems as if Janney is going to win.  I have not seen her performance so at this point I cannot criticize that choice if they go that way.

Agree with just about all of that but I liked Billboard a little better than Shape simply because it was basically a Splash remake of sorts.  Liked it just not as much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Shocker said:

Agree with just about all of that but I liked Billboard a little better than Shape simply because it was basically a Splash remake of sorts.  Liked it just not as much.

I can definitely understand the preference, it is my second choice of the ones nominated.  I would be perfectly okay with either of them or Darkest Hour.   

The last two years have been weird.  Normally there is a film that I definitely think should win.  Lately I have been more likely to have several I would be okay with.  Last year I had four (of course non of them won).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/21/2018 at 10:36 PM, Shocker said:

Agree with just about all of that but I liked Billboard a little better than Shape simply because it was basically a Splash remake of sorts.  Liked it just not as much.

oh, I thought of The Incredible Mr Limpet...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/21/2018 at 8:47 PM, Goondal said:

 

Best Director: Guillermo del Toro
I actually think he is going to win.  He should have won for Pan’s Labryinth (the film should have won too) and I will be really excited to see him get the award.

 

I have a seriously difficult time believing that Shape of Water is better than Pan's Labyrinth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Porn Shop Clerk said:

I have a seriously difficult time believing that Shape of Water is better than Pan's Labyrinth.

Oh it is not.  The Shape of Water was the best nominated film this year.  Pan's Labyrinth is my second or third all-time film. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't necessarily think he will be moved, I would currently be leaning against that notion. I think a lot will depend on the coaching situation. Carroll certainly can't be thinking about wanting to go through a serious strip down and overhaul, so the longer he plans to remain, the less likely I think Crosby gets moved.
    • I think everyone says Mike Evans because of size, but really they have different strengths and play styles.  Tmac is better on intermediate routes and not nearly as good at contested catches. 
    • At this point, it is criminal to go into the 2026 training camp/OTA's with XL penciled in as a #2 WR. The team must upgrade, either through free agency or the draft. If he cannot give 100% effort on significantly less snaps as a #4-6 WR(players like Tremayne have done that consistently) then I don't think you have a player worth rostering beyond the trade deadline. Offensively, we eventually have to upgrade to an NFL starting caliber C. It's been almost the length of time from Gross to Ikey since Kalil retired and we have below average to terrible C play. Love Mays as a BC-esque utility backup but he will never be an above average long term starting C.  The TE room is one of the worst in the NFL but it's a low usage position in this offense, so the investments are likely to be small, if any. I would never expect to see an elite TE in a Dave Canales offense. 100% agree on OL depth. We actually aren't bad there but BC will be gone, Mays is a UFA, Corbett is a UFA and Zavala has been both injured and bad. We have to bolster that depth again or resign guys like Mays and Corbett to keep that depth somewhat stable.
×
×
  • Create New...