Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ownership options so far


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

This isn't a court of law. There's no judge. There's no jury. There's no "beyond reasonable doubt" standard that has to be met. All the NFL has to do is believe something happened, and SI already gathered enough evidence themselves to show that.

He's done.

Lol...and Hurney was done too...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, heel31ok said:

Lol...and Hurney was done too...

Nah. Hurney was never in anything close to the kind of trouble that Richardson is in.

Richardson is never going to be part of the Panthers organization again. And the team will be better off because of that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

While answering media questions Saturday in Los Angeles before Sunday’s NBA All-Star Game, the Golden State Warrior star hinted that he’s involved in some kind of deal. But he was much quieter on the topic than he’s been in the past.

He wouldn’t say where the process stands, for instance, nor with whom he is working.

“It’s ongoing. I’ll just leave it at that for now. It’s ongoing,” Curry said.

Steph Curry offers a few new thoughts on potential Carolina Panthers ownership

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, boney said:

Curry was initially linked with Diddy then I saw an item later on linking him with someone else. Might have been Sabates but I don't remember for certain.

He certainly doesn't have the money to be a majority owner but I imagine he'd have enough to buy a small percentage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, heel31ok said:

Self loathing is treatable...there is hope for you but you have want to change...

Dude, unless you actually have something interesting to say (which would would be a first for your entire posting career on here) don't bother.

Like I said, if you're just going to do your usual thing of continuing to post stupid little snippets, I'm not interested.

You have nothing of any value to contribute to any conversation on here. Do us all a favor and go back to the children's table.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Dude, unless you actually have something interesting to say (which would would be a first for your entire posting career on here) don't bother.

Like I said, if you're just going to do your usual thing of continuing to post stupid little snippets, I'm not interested.

You have nothing of any value to contribute to any conversation on here. Do us all a favor and go back to the children's table.

Classic symptoms...take the first step 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

This isn't a court of law. There's no judge. There's no jury. There's no "beyond reasonable doubt" standard that has to be met. All the NFL has to do is believe something happened, and SI already gathered enough evidence themselves to show that.

He's done.

Perhaps the Panthers haven't reached this level yet in the Carolinas but take the LA Dodgers as an example. I consider the Dodgers a public trust. The Dodgers are part of the fabric of Southern California and by and large has been a class organization that has done things the right way in business and by the fan. A few years back Frank McCourt purchased the Dodgers but did not last for long as he was not the right ownership. Guggenheim, with Magic Johnson out front now runs the Dodgers and things are as they should be. 

Who owns the Panthers isn't as important as how the organization is run top to bottom. Run it the right way and win games, Panther fans should demand no less.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • ESPN’s recent grades has Charlotte with a B. I haven’t paid attention to any others really. 
    • It’s simple. Win and everyone in here will say the culture is good. Dear lord the amount of time spent on these posts is hysterical. We’ve seen the end of season swoons where you can tell the team had given up with many of the same leaders that took us to playoff seasons. When your OL is decimated by injuries, it’s amazing how fast culture turns. When you get on a tear like 2015, everyone’s having fun. You need the right people regardless, but they have to win.
    • The difference is about how much player input is allowed and encouraged in the decision making process. Top down teams tend to dictate to players how everything is handled. Disagreements are handled by the coach and players are expected to do what they are told regardless of what they think or feel.  Players are perceived as commodities to be used until we find better. In player led teams player input is encouraged and valued. Players and especially leaders are expected to settle their own disagreements and be accountable to the team but mostly to each other. Players are family to be appreciated and supported in their growth. Is the reality of football the same in both? Yeah there are limited positions, football is a business and winning is the bottom line. Coaches get final say and run the program because that is their job. But in player led teams they feel valued, appreciated, part of a larger whole. Most people who have worked at multiple jobs know exactly what I am talking about. When players try to run the show and don't value  coach input that isn't a player led team, that is a circus which we surely are familiar with in our past.  
×
×
  • Create New...