Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Stirs 2018 Mock

stirs

By stirs,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

stirs Grand Master

stirs

Posted
Posted

 

 

1st  Jaire Alexander  CB Louisville  Confident guy who will be the best value when pick #24 comes around

 

2nd  Gesicki TE  Penn State  Will learn behind Olsen and be put in on certain sets

 

3rd  Equanimeous St Brown  WR  Notre Dame very long and talented receiver like Norv Turner likes

 

3rd Jerome Baker LB  Ohio State  Quick LB who can succeed TD

 

5th  Royce Freeman  RB  Oregon  Big compact RB who can replace Stewart.  Many good backs in this draft and they will all go later than they wish.

 

6th  Ade Aruna DE Tulane  Guy who is quick and long, can put on more weight.  Has not played football that long and excelling

 

7th  Troy Apke  S  Penn State  Last 2 picks are slated for special teams unless they surpass expectations

7th  Darius Phillips CB  Western Michigan  See above

 

 

 

Now at least you don't have to worry this weekend if something comes up and you can't watch

Link to comment
Share on other sites
stirs Grand Master

stirs

Posted
  • Author
Posted
3 minutes ago, SOJA said:

love everything but the baker pick 

As far as Riveria, I think LB's are extremely important to his Defense.  Big guys up front and playmakers right behind them.  If TD is gone next season, I think we will suffer greatly and Luke cannot do it all, thus the pick to learn behind TD

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SOJA Veteran

SOJA

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, stirs said:

As far as Riveria, I think LB's are extremely important to his Defense.  Big guys up front and playmakers right behind them.  If TD is gone next season, I think we will suffer greatly and Luke cannot do it all, thus the pick to learn behind TD

but isn't the guy behind him Shaq lol?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
stirs Grand Master

stirs

Posted
  • Author
Posted
2 minutes ago, SOJA said:

but isn't the guy behind him Shaq lol?

 

If they move Shaq to TD's position, yes, but then we are still a playmaker short, you know what I mean.

I always feel like certain positions should be elevated above others.  DE for example, for us, is right behind QB in my opinion.

I really think we are scary thin at LB.  TD only gonna play 12 games barring injury and Luke will be retiring if he gets another concussion.  I guess LB's are just on my mind, a lot.

Well, at least the others passed muster

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SOJA Veteran

SOJA

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, stirs said:

If they move Shaq to TD's position, yes, but then we are still a playmaker short, you know what I mean.

I always feel like certain positions should be elevated above others.  DE for example, for us, is right behind QB in my opinion.

I really think we are scary thin at LB.  TD only gonna play 12 games barring injury and Luke will be retiring if he gets another concussion.  I guess LB's are just on my mind, a lot.

Well, at least the others passed muster

I see your point, I suppose I am just mentally preparing to address that in the next draft in which I agree LB will be a concern

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      We joke about how the NFL has a script for the season. But maybe it's not a joke?

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • rayzor
      Our guys working their azz's off to be the winners they know they are!!

      By rayzor · Posted

      Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Rocky Davis
      NHL Draft 2025

      By Rocky Davis · Posted

      Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...