Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

They figured out Double Trouble?!? NOT!


rippadonn

Recommended Posts

The Panthers have three bread-and-butter run plays.

One is a strong-side zone play, where the back starts out toward the tight end side of the line, the linemen block straight ahead on whichever defender is in their zone and the back has the ability to cut back against the flow of the play if he wishes.

Another is a strong-side draw play, in which the quarterback and offensive linemen set up like it's a pass, and the back takes a handoff to the tight end side of the line.

Another is a weak-side iso (or isolation), in which the fullback leads the play away from the tight end side and the back attacks the gap between the defensive linemen on that side of the line.

"Our job as defenders is to make sure they don't have that crack," Ellison said. "We have to build up that wall where every time they think they see a lane, we've got to have a defender in that crack. That's the way we have to stop them."

more : http://www.buffalonews.com/452/story/838626.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:eek: Oh ya just give our gameplan away to the other teams in the league.:rolleyes: now our season is over lol. :shocked: But honestly the running game didn't start getting going until we started playing these teams with no wins hardly. I want to see how double trouble is going to do agaist the good teams like the Pats and Saints when they play them. What I really want to see happen is that Fox change QBs are change the gameplan to better fit Jake playing right now. Which ain't good at all right now.:gnorsi:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Panthers have three bread-and-butter run plays.

One is a strong-side zone play, where the back starts out toward the tight end side of the line, the linemen block straight ahead on whichever defender is in their zone and the back has the ability to cut back against the flow of the play if he wishes.

Another is a strong-side draw play, in which the quarterback and offensive linemen set up like it's a pass, and the back takes a handoff to the tight end side of the line.

Another is a weak-side iso (or isolation), in which the fullback leads the play away from the tight end side and the back attacks the gap between the defensive linemen on that side of the line.

"Our job as defenders is to make sure they don't have that crack," Ellison said. "We have to build up that wall where every time they think they see a lane, we've got to have a defender in that crack. That's the way we have to stop them."

more : http://www.buffalonews.com/452/story/838626.html

The Packers of the Lombardi era had 6 running plays........and ran them very well. Just saying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Packers of the Lombardi era had 6 running plays........and ran them very well. Just saying.

That means we're behind the curve by 40+ years. Much tooo predictable, that's the problem.

I'd like to see us mix things up more. For people to simplify our run game to just three basic plays is pathetic. But hey, If you're hittin' em' in the mouth so what?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:eek: Oh ya just give our gameplan away to the other teams in the league.:rolleyes: now our season is over lol. :shocked: But honestly the running game didn't start getting going until we started playing these teams with no wins hardly. I want to see how double trouble is going to do agaist the good teams like the Pats and Saints when they play them. What I really want to see happen is that Fox change QBs are change the gameplan to better fit Jake playing right now. Which ain't good at all right now.:gnorsi:

I don't care what the aints record is. They can't count that game a win ahead of time. Any NFC South can beat the other at any time except for Tampa right now.

I'll worry more about the Pats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • A winning record would be nice, but I still have us winning around the 6 to 8 game mark. Realistically we should beat the Jets and Saints, that gets us to 5 wins. After that, we have to face a lot of potential play off teams and our divisional opponents. I think we’ll win 1 or 2 of those games to take us to 6 or 7 wins, perhaps 8 wins if we can spring a further surprise.  Is that enough progress for head coach and QB? I’m not sure, it will depend on performances and output. That said, it’s nice to be back in a position where we are thinking about the play offs.
    • I would tend to agree about not falling into the trap and paying a below average QB, but sometimes situations can “force” a team to pay that QB. For example, if we play ourselves into a 9-8 like record, then what options will we have in the draft? Or do we avoid the draft and trade for or sign someone in free agency?  I’m not convinced by the 2026 QB draft class. There’s some intriguing prospects but no one that really screams “draft me”. I’m not sure we’ve got anyone really that stands out as a trade candidate or free agent signing. So although we might not want to commit a big money contract to Young, him playing well and showing progress might force the team’s hand. 
    • Realistically we would be looking at no more than a mid round pick for Dowdle or Chuba. Are we really that desperate for a mid round pick? Not really. I would much prefer us utilise the two RBs in a 1-2 punch similar to how we used D-Will and Stewart. After all, Bryce is not Drew Brees. He won’t throw for 300+ yards and carry the team consistently as a passer. So having a strong running game with a 1-2 punch will be beneficial to him, and it will also be beneficial to the RBs because we can spell them and not overwork them.
×
×
  • Create New...