Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Pat McAfee talks Refs and PI Reviews


Kuhndog94

Recommended Posts

I listen to the Pat McAfee show and this was a topic I thought a few of you might be interested in. I figured it was relevant because we've had a few PI calls reviewed that clearly should've been overturned... but we know how that turned out 

Take a look:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Video 100% on point

 

The reason the new challenges aren't working is because the NFL still isn't addressing the other problem in the  room. The officials don't think they can be held accountable. They are humans like everyone else, some are probably assholes. They don't like being told they're wrong, they probably don't like getting yelled that. They'll get indignant just to keep the upper hand.  The NFL has backed them and coddled them because they represent the shield and think they can't be overturned. Until that stops you're still going to get BS calls.  Taking the review away from the on field ref doesn't seem to work because the official they all refer to is backing them up all the way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't watch the video but I was contemplating this as the games were on Sunday and it seemed to me that for whatever reason they decided not to overturn any of them. They will keep it in their back pocket and can pull it out if there is a repeat of what caused them to be pressured into making it challengeable in the first place.

I ended up thinking we will see fewer and fewer challenges as they are clearly not overturning calls, coaches will hesitate to waste a challenge, and NFL has what they want. Which apparently is blind or crooked refs running wild and deciding outcomes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No saying he mostly sucks is saying that he doesn’t suck the minority of the time.   Like if he took 17 tests and had a couple of really good showings and a handful of pretty good scores sprinkled in among the typical sub par results.   Like a golfer who went out and shot an 89.  There will be some real nice shots sprinkled in there but at the end of the day it is still 89.    
    • It's worth mentioning... Game 1: Oct 11 in Raleigh. 4-3 OT win with a complete starting lineup. Game 2: Dec 13 in Philly. 4-3 SO win without Jaccob Slavin. Game 3: Dec 14 in Raleigh. 3-2 SO win with a complete starting lineup. Game 4: Apr 13 in Philly. 3-2 SO loss with the AHL roster.  Those early season games were no indication of the Canes team that finished the season. Miller and Ehlers were still trying to figure things out, Nikishin was still a work in progress and the Stankoven line was just another line. Make no mistake, the Canes team Philly will see is nothing close to what they saw at any point in the season. If the top line starts producing, Freddie stays hot and the blue line does what it does, this could be a sweep as well.   
    • He is an employee of the team and speaking on the team's official channel. They arent critical of anything ever.
×
×
  • Create New...