Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Pat McAfee talks Refs and PI Reviews


Kuhndog94

Recommended Posts

I listen to the Pat McAfee show and this was a topic I thought a few of you might be interested in. I figured it was relevant because we've had a few PI calls reviewed that clearly should've been overturned... but we know how that turned out 

Take a look:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Video 100% on point

 

The reason the new challenges aren't working is because the NFL still isn't addressing the other problem in the  room. The officials don't think they can be held accountable. They are humans like everyone else, some are probably assholes. They don't like being told they're wrong, they probably don't like getting yelled that. They'll get indignant just to keep the upper hand.  The NFL has backed them and coddled them because they represent the shield and think they can't be overturned. Until that stops you're still going to get BS calls.  Taking the review away from the on field ref doesn't seem to work because the official they all refer to is backing them up all the way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't watch the video but I was contemplating this as the games were on Sunday and it seemed to me that for whatever reason they decided not to overturn any of them. They will keep it in their back pocket and can pull it out if there is a repeat of what caused them to be pressured into making it challengeable in the first place.

I ended up thinking we will see fewer and fewer challenges as they are clearly not overturning calls, coaches will hesitate to waste a challenge, and NFL has what they want. Which apparently is blind or crooked refs running wild and deciding outcomes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Trade up for a project was dumb, he's gonna be 25 next month. By the time you're deciding on whether he's worth the 5th year option or a big contract you're already gonna be thinking about moving on soon either way.  
    • I mean this is legit AF statement....you don't spend that draft capital on a project just like you don't trade up for an injured RB either, which was done in the same draft.  That draft IMO was a necessary evil for DM to learn from his mistakes (I think he did but some may not). Also I have to mention I'm a big Coker fan and think getting him as an UDFA was obv a steal.  Coker is the better WR2 at this point as Legette and its not even debatable unfortunately.  Give him year 3 but don't expect much from him.  Continue in the offseason with adding as much talent and competition on the roster as possible including WR.  Or just trade his ass for peanuts and continue to build roster by any means.......  
    • Losing him was a huge loss. Look at how the Bears went from a 5 win team to now a 11 win team. The Lions offensive line is bad this year, secondary is bad and Campbell going for it on 4th down all the time has cost them games instead of taking the Field Goals. Goff is inconsistent as well.
×
×
  • Create New...