Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Pat McAfee talks Refs and PI Reviews


Kuhndog94

Recommended Posts

I listen to the Pat McAfee show and this was a topic I thought a few of you might be interested in. I figured it was relevant because we've had a few PI calls reviewed that clearly should've been overturned... but we know how that turned out 

Take a look:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Video 100% on point

 

The reason the new challenges aren't working is because the NFL still isn't addressing the other problem in the  room. The officials don't think they can be held accountable. They are humans like everyone else, some are probably assholes. They don't like being told they're wrong, they probably don't like getting yelled that. They'll get indignant just to keep the upper hand.  The NFL has backed them and coddled them because they represent the shield and think they can't be overturned. Until that stops you're still going to get BS calls.  Taking the review away from the on field ref doesn't seem to work because the official they all refer to is backing them up all the way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't watch the video but I was contemplating this as the games were on Sunday and it seemed to me that for whatever reason they decided not to overturn any of them. They will keep it in their back pocket and can pull it out if there is a repeat of what caused them to be pressured into making it challengeable in the first place.

I ended up thinking we will see fewer and fewer challenges as they are clearly not overturning calls, coaches will hesitate to waste a challenge, and NFL has what they want. Which apparently is blind or crooked refs running wild and deciding outcomes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mel Kiper said he would retire if Jimmy Clausen wasn't a successful NFL starter too. Just because the experts make a claim doesnt mean it's true either.  Bryce may be a serviceable QB for someone. Serviceable QBs don't bring you a perennial winner or lead you to the playoffs over and over. Serviceable QBs also dont get 50m plus per year deals which is what a Bryce extension would look like.  The stats show he hasn't been even a serviceable QB in the 3 years he's been here. The eye test shows he hasn't put together 2 franchise QB salary games back to back in 3 years.  Complain all you want about people being negative, but people pointing out that Bryce is held to a different standard than anyone else on the team isn't complaining. It's stating the obvious. 
    • We have big bodied WRs and 3 TEs who all have potential and each bring something different to the table. I never saw the need to go out there and try and find a new starting TE.  While it's nice to have a guy like McBride, Bowers, etc, I think a team's better use of the cap is by having TEs on rookie contracts or cheap vets, not having to pay elite TE money.
    • He had the award until like the last 8 games. He sucked ass and flagg had 3 40 point games
×
×
  • Create New...