Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I Tried To Defend Davidson, But I Can't Anymore


beastson

Recommended Posts

I used to say he limit us cause of Jake... if we had another QB we'll be fine

But nope, we had Matt on 3rd and short and can't even throw an out route to a TE. No screens or nothing. IM NOT JUST TALKING ABOUT THIS PLAY, THE 2ND HALF IN GENERAL. Ridiculous. His play calling is just dumb. He can be gone too

Link to comment
Share on other sites

he's an nfl offensive coordinator, he knows risk vs reward, whats the point of risking a turnover when the run game has been dominating all day along with the defense?

Risk? Oh you mean risking our defense to not give up points and keep them from getting back in the game

Our DEFENSE won this game for us, but what if things went the Cards O way?

I'm tired of this conservative crap. Our offense too talented for that. All we needed was 1 Td and we could put this game away. But noooooo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

he's an nfl offensive coordinator, he knows risk vs reward, whats the point of risking a turnover when the run game has been dominating all day along with the defense?

In this game, with Moore in at quarterback and a lead slowly slipping away, it might be smart to keep it on the ground.

But today, we were fortunate to go up what, 21 points early on? In any other game, we would have to complete some throws to have any shot at winning.

Our offense is very much a one-trick pony right now. We had early shots to Jarrett and Barnidge early on, and I hoped we'd see more. I know the running game is working pretty well overall, but that doesn't change the fact that there were a few wasted drives that we should have been able to capitalize on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Risk? Oh you mean risking our defense to not give up points and keep them from getting back in the game

Our DEFENSE won this game for us, but what if things went the Cards O way?

I'm tired of this conservative crap. Our offense too talented for that. All we needed was 1 Td and we could put this game away. But noooooo

no risking matt moore throwing a pick when we're in our own territory.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

as a davidson hater, i have to say you're just flat wrong. that was a great play call going for the big strike. it was moore who missed a wide open receiver!

jeff called a brilliant game! heavy running and even some passing on first down early to throw off the cardinal defense. we are so predictable with first down running. and my fav play of the game.... after the failed smoke route to smith, i was mad because we run that play too much and i told the guys i was watching the game with that we should fake that route because they jump on it and it would go for an easy touchdown!

a few plays later.......... damn i'm good!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hidden

as a davidson hater, i have to say you're just flat wrong. that was a great play call going for the big strike. it was moore who missed a wide open receiver!

jeff called a brilliant game! heavy running and even some passing on first down early to throw off the cardinal defense. we are so predictable with first down running. and my fav play of the game.... after the failed smoke route to smith, i was mad because we run that play too much and i told the guys i was watching the game with that we should fake that route because they jump on it and it would go for an easy touchdown!

a few plays later.......... damn i'm good!

Link to comment

Risk? Oh you mean risking our defense to not give up points and keep them from getting back in the game

Our DEFENSE won this game for us, but what if things went the Cards O way?

I'm tired of this conservative crap. Our offense too talented for that. All we needed was 1 Td and we could put this game away. But noooooo

i think it's all john fox. you look at how we all bemoaned dan henning for being so conservative and all the BS plays he ran here.

no one would look at miami and think they're a conservative offense.

good win today but AFAIC, jake still sucks and is the major reason we have to run such conservative crap...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • “Y’all been watching film, huh? That’s cool, watch this.”
    • Really? Wow. Sorry. Got my timeline messed up. I remember someone claiming to be Graham’s mom on the old Charlotte.com board so I guess it was a long time ago that he was here. I guess I thought he was after Kasay. 
    • Nick Scott has gotten his share of Huddle hate, but I came across this SI article by Zach Roberts when I was researching recently released Quandre Diggs, speculated to be a better option  (https://lastwordonsports.com/nfl/2025/11/07/breaking-titans-cut-former-three-time-pro-bowler-quandre-diggs-4-destinations-ranked/3/), but getting back to Nick Scott... Now to be fair, the observation on Scott was before the Packers game, but the stats couldn't have changed that much, and may have gotten better.   "At some point during virtually every Carolina Panthers game, you have probably found yourself grumbling about Nick Scott. The much-maligned safety has seemingly been out of position a lot or has failed to make a play. The eye test has often let him down. "But that's why stats are so helpful. Sometimes, the eye test, especially for fans, is unreliable. On occasion, advanced metrics help make sense of things and lend more clarity. In the case of Scott, they make him look like a much better safety than any of us would've guessed. "In coverage, Scott has given up just 15 yards and an average of five yards per catch. That's the lowest among safeties, leading superstars like Julian Love, Talanoa Hafunga, Quandre Diggs, Kerby Joseph, Kyle Hamilton, and Minkah Fitzpatrick. "In FI%, the safety leads all his counterparts once again at 40%. Brian Branch, Camren Kinchens, and Xavier McKinney are some notable names he leads. He's been pretty excellent in pass coverage, which is crucial for the Panthers." For those wondering, "FI" means forced incompletions. Now I'm way past trying to figure out why X links aren't embedding for me like they used to, but here you go: https://x.com/dacornerman/status/1981363757608513632?t=rx_5iLjp8_y5huNcg_y1nA&s=19   Suffice it to say that Scott may not be as bad as some have led on.    https://www.si.com/nfl/panthers/onsi/news/much-maligned-panthers-db-way-better-than-think      
×
×
  • Create New...