Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Javon Kinlaw Discussion


Shocker

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, MHS831 said:

This.   Well put.  If people are all torn up about 2020 needs--a season that may or may not be played (who knows) then I ask you to consider two facts about the game:

1.  Rookies, nearly all of them, are raw and learning.  Most are liabilities if they are forced into starting roles as rookies.  At the positions we have needs, not many "ball out" as rookies.  It may look good on paper, but you have to think longer term than 16 games at the end of the current year.  Start thinking of the draft as addressing needs or upgrading the 2021 roster--that is when these rookies will be playing their brand of professional football.   Fortunately, we have veterans in front of DT and OT now--not the best---but able bodies to carry any rookie into his sophomore NFL season.

2.  Teams struggle to find 3 kinds of players in the draft--these players are the most coveted, the most aligned with winning. 1) Quarterback.  2) Edge pass rushers such as defensive ends or 3-4 OLBs, and 3) pass protectors.  The most important pass protector is a LT.  The second most important pass protector is a RT.  The reason you need them?  They keep your only hope for winning a super bowl, the QB--your biggest investment, healthy. 

So having said that, let's look at our 2021 situation at those three positions.  It makes no sense to prioritize other positions if these three are not set.

1. Quarterback:  Bridgewater will be on the second year of a 3-year contract.  If he has done well, we have 2 years of stability at QB.  If not, we are drafting a QB.

2. Edge rushers:  We have Burns.  We have Weatherly.  We have Haynes and Miller.  Not exactly scary, but if Burns steps up in year 2, we could be OK.   Not happy, but we have role players and Burns' potential.

3. LT:  Okung will be 32 and his contract will expire.  Unlikely to return.  Greg Little has had a year to learn and thicken his skull-the fact that Okung was brought in is hardly and endorsement for Little.  Do they really assume he will be ready in 2021?  I do not buy it.  We are in position to draft a starting LT in the best T draft in recent memory.  Do we draft a DT and ignore 2021 altogether, hoping that Little will be ready or that we can find a LT in the draft or free agency?  That kind of thinking is how we have operated since Gross retired.

RT:  Moton's contract expires.  Moton has been  slightly above average to good, not great.  What if he pulls a Bradberry and wants top 5 money?  He would have the Panthers over a barrel if they have no plan B.  Frankly, I read an article when he was drafted that said, "Moton will be a serviceable tackle, but he would be a standout G."  I never forgot it.  How good would the OL be if we moved Moton inside to LG and drafted Wills or Wirfs?  

If we draft Wirfs or Wills, and take a player like Galimore or Blacklock in the second, is that not the smartest move?  Brown can play various techniques, and that makes him valuable, but he is not going to play every defensive snap in a rotation--maybe 50% of them.  A T plays them all.  I want my best players on the field all the time.  If the defense is on the field for 45% of a football game, and the player you draft is on the field for 50% of those snaps, our first round pick would be playing about 22.5% of the game, compared to an OT playing 45% of the game.

 

 

Good post, good breakdown

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That's a very incorrect statement right off the bat, coaches get fired for winning ugly all the time.  Every coach of a playoff team that then gets fired, got fired because they won ugly and didn't improve their players enough to win in the postseason. Guys like Andy Reid have been fired for "winning ugly" like you said, because they kept winning in spite of the improvement of their players. Also, "this is a fanbase starved for wins" is a statement I also don't agree with, I'm not "starved for wins", I'm "starved for a winning and contending franchise" which are two VERY different things. If the team and fans just want to win some games, then that's a loser mentality, sorry, but it is.  We should want to contend, not win a handful of games.  Every time this comes up I point back to the Lions the last 5 years or so.  They were losing games but improving every week while doing so a few years back.  THAT is how you improve as a franchise and move the needle towards contending, not winning games ugly.
    • Good lord. I don’t think I have ever seen a hole that open. 
    • this is true.  But NFL Ss and defenses are actively taking that away and playing to take them away vs most teams.  The problem thus far in BY's career......is they are cheating and not respecting the deep game which makes the smaller/mid range game harder to pull off.  and Dallas is an anomaly game.  using those random games that run counter to vast work......doesn't really change the discussion/issues in Carolina.  Bryce Young took the shots this week because they were not just NFL open but college open.    Wide open dudes downfield that really were coverage busts/issues. 
×
×
  • Create New...