Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A New Offensive Philosophy?


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

Another thing that bend but don't break does is loses the battle of field position for us. In this regard, Mark Jones has been colossal for us this season. Last night pissed me off because Fox played his conservative 2nd half offense, even after realizing we couldn't stop the Giants offense. I've lost count of the number of games where we've broken another team's will right off the bat, only to come down with a massive episode of vaginismus, and invite the opponent back to the table.

I have seen the shift as well, and wonder if we would even be in the playoff hunt without out the key 1st round picks in Stewart and Otah.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe Fox is waiting for the playoffs to start playing an aggressive defense, in turn shocking the playoff contenders and leaving our competition with no clue about how to strike back?

It's about all I can hope for.

Nice idea.

I've heard it suggested that our offense is "quick strike" now. I'm not ready to go that far yet, but we do have quick strike capability.

Someone suggested that this would tend to tire out the defense more, and that's possible. Of course, if the defense were consistently getting off the field on third down, fatigue wouldn't be an issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that its JUST time. Turgo has been doing the same dumb poo for too long and in this copycat league teams noticed and learn how to make his defense a NO Factor. Its basicly try what you want for the 1st 2 downs and if it doesnt work just hit your TE on a short slant to get 3 more tries....

Even back to the Arizona game, if our offense would have not been able to get that 1st down at the end we would have probably lost. Our Defense needs to find their grove and FAST.

Pathetic.........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's the "bend, don't break" notion. It's what we've philosophically become.

on defense i think this is what they have been doing for a while.

if they do it right we will keep them out of the end zone. if they bend like a wet noodle, like they did last night, it spells disaster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

on defense i think this is what they have been doing for a while.

if they do it right we will keep them out of the end zone. if they bend like a wet noodle, like they did last night, it spells disaster.

I've never liked the philosophy, regardless of circumstance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
    • Especially since we’re neck and neck with them for the play in
×
×
  • Create New...