Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Evaluation of all offensive plays evaluation of Baker in cards game


raleigh-panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 10/7/2022 at 2:19 AM, Proudiddy said:

I think it's important to emphasize the part about there being only one receiver in many routes, as it lends to my belaboring the point about the RPOs/playcalls being a huge chunk of the problem.  Again, with most RPOs, you only have 1, maybe 2 at most, receiving options, but generally, realistically, no matter how many routes are included, there is really only 1 available because of the timing of the play.  If you take too long to throw, you'll end up getting an illegal man downfield penalty because they continue to block as if it was a run...  so because of the timing, you only have that primary read or hand it off.  Again, it's why I keep saying they're running way too much of it and it compounds and accentuates why the offense looks so disjointed and so dysfunctional.  From the batted balls to the seeming bad play calls where it appears nothing was ever open and we just eat a sack or hand it off late to a TFL...  so much of it is because they keep running RPOs.  The defensive linemen mush rushing to watch the run while they are playing the one route, the DBs are sitting on those limited routes, and it leaves nothing in a matter of a second or two after the snap.  I just can't understand, especially considering the early returns, why McAdoodoo insists on continuing continuing run it so much, if at all at this point.  It is such a hindrance.

It's my fault, I used RPOs against his man blitz on Madden 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean, poster also said Young or Mahomes, it would have made no difference.  If there was way to actually test that hypothetical, I would sell every belonging I have and wager that Mahomes would indeed yield different results.  Mahomes automatically changes the D coverages.  He automatically changes the threats.  He attacks and threatens a field different vastly different.   We have seen good QBs and great QBs play behind horrific OLs in a single season....and they don't default into being the worst team in the NFL.  Frank Reich was old, stubborn and not creative enough to deal with an anomaly QB like Bryce.  The best QB in the NFL wouldn't be handicapping Frank, they would be enhancing Frank.  Starting week 1, Frank didn't even trust Bryce with basics....Frank gave him I what I feel comfortable with you being able to do offense.  Which took throws and plays off the table because Bryce couldn't do early on what a bad vet in Dalton could.  Mahomes would not yield the same results. 
    • All I have to say to this really, is it sounds nice and downgrades Stroud to make Young look better is more like what this take does. Look at the WR numbers the year before and then the year with Stroud. He made them better, not the other way around. That’s my opinion. I appreciate you designating that it was yours. Many state these things as facts.
    • but what if.....and here me out....the pro Bryce Young stuff was coming from people under Fitterer.  You know, the people who are employed to feed him that input.  And they happen to all still be employed here.  when Rhule was fired I desperately wanted Fitterer fired.  It set things up for Fitterer to be the sacrificial lamb the next time things went poorly....every time we move on from a disaster, we are retaining a heavy % of the folks who helped bring the disaster we are "moving on from".  Everyone argued Fitterer probably could be great and it was all Rhule.  We are just repeating the same stuff to a degree IMO.   Panthers needed a clean slate post Rhule era.  Needed another post Frank era.  Things were just too bad or too dysfunctional IMO to be salvaging so much.   We keep failing to do that. 
×
×
  • Create New...