Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Payton on the record concerning Carolina game


Jangler

Recommended Posts

http://www.nola.com/saints/t-p/index.ssf?/base/sports-4/1230013372224160.xml&coll=1

Coach Sean Payton plans to do his level best to achieve two "records" in the Saints' regular-season finale against the playoff-bound Carolina Panthers.

With a victory Sunday at the Superdome, the Saints would finish 9-7 and post their second winning record under Payton in three seasons. With 402 passing yards, Pro Bowl quarterback Drew Brees would eclipse Dan Marino's NFL record of 5,084 set in 1984.

But Payton made it clear that he won't sacrifice one at the expense of achieving the other.

"We're playing to win the game," Payton said Monday. "We're not going to take a look at new players, the same way with the Detroit game. It's our jobs as coaches and players to win.

"It's a meaningful game because we have an opportunity to be 9-7. We think that's significant. Certainly in Carolina's case, it's an important game for them. With everything that has unfolded, this is an important game for both teams."

"What's important is winning," Payton said. "Certainly, a milestone like the record we're talking about is significant, but nonetheless what's most important to our team, to Drew Brees, to the organization, is winning this football game and finishing 9-7.

"That said, something like that is significant. But I think it's only rewarding if something like that happens when you play well and you win rather than just if you hang around and throw it around just for the sake of the record. Our job as coaches this week and as players is to get ready to put our best game plan together to beat the Carolina Panthers, not to throw for (402) yards."

"It's a milestone that's fairly uncommon," Payton said. "Honestly, it hasn't been a point of discussion with him or me at all, or with the offense at all. If you asked anyone in that room starting with Drew or the running backs or the offensive linemen if a coach has talked at all (about the record), I really haven't even discussed it with him.

"I think our players expect me -- the head coach -- and our staff to give them a plan to win the game, and they would all probably be supportive of Drew being able to get that within the confines of our game plan. What's most important is winning the game and Drew would tell you that, our players would tell you that and our staff would tell you that."

Saying all the right things. But My guess is they will try and win the game and if Brees gets 400+yards fine, but the win is more important, the way it should be. So no, I don't think there is a fix to get him the yards. Why would the Panthers even agree to something so monumentally stupid? If we can keep him on his back, he shouldn't get half of what he needs. I think that will be one motivating factor to this game, stopping Brees from getting the record. And also getting the #2 seed. This should be a very good game Sunday, with our defense showing they are ready to play in the playoffs and shutting down all that we face.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope along with a win, the Panthers keep Brees from reaching the record. I actually like Brees. But I don't want to see all the f*cking ESPN highlights of him breaking the record while carving up our secondary. Over and over they'll be showing videos of the Panthers getting burned on passing plays, even if we win the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 years from now on NFL films they will be showing brees season record if we let him get it, I dont think we will, I believe that they will try to run against our banged up D lineand wont be that good, then I think they will start to air it out and I see us geting 3 picks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 years from now on NFL films they will be showing brees season record if we let him get it, I dont think we will, I believe that they will try to run against our banged up D lineand wont be that good, then I think they will start to air it out and I see us geting 3 picks

And NFL Films will end that segment by saying that the Panthers won the game anyway and went on to win the Super Bowl.

One can only hope!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was watching a YouTube and it was said that scout and GM insider types were saying the NIL had killed rounds 4-7. I don’t know that I buy it, seems like it might for a year or maybe two but then those guys have to move on.  NCAA is apparently about to give 5 years of eligibility. It is gonna skew those entrants older maybe.   
    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...