Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

To fill the void left from the normal "disrespect" and "under the radar" threads...

faultlessjoint

By faultlessjoint,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

faultlessjoint Newbie

faultlessjoint

Posted
Posted

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/multimedia/photo_gallery/0912/all-decade.nfl.top.10.games/content.1.html?eref=twitter_feed

No Super Bowl 38??? One of the best super bowls ever. Two teams trading blows all the way to the finish.

Is it not mentioned because it's the panthers? Or because Janet Jacksons *** made everyone forget that there was actually a game being played?

Rabble rabble rabble!!! Something about respect!!! New York!??!!?! Espn!! Rabble!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
British_Panther Newbie

British_Panther

Posted
Posted

Superbowl 42 >>>>>>>>>>> Superbowl 43

I watched both with people who had never watched an NFL game before.

Superbowl 42 was about good enough to convince die hard soccer fans that NFL was the greatest sport in the world.

Superbowl 43 was boring. We only actually paid attention 1/3 rd of the time, just for every 3rd and 6+ that Big Ben converted by running around in the backfield for a few minutes before hitting someone wide open.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • LinvilleGorge
      Mini camp tweets

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • tukafan21
      Mini camp tweets

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
    • LinvilleGorge
      BREAKING: Panthers interested in Justin Simmons

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      We clearly need to add a veteran stopgap at safety one way or the other.
×
×
  • Create New...