Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Football Night in America


davos

Recommended Posts

It was all ruined when someone said we drafted stewartt cause williams was a vust.

Smh

Well "bust" was one of the words being floated when the Panthers drafted a running back in the first round for the second time in three years. Rumor was Fox thought Williams didn't have what it takes to be a feature back. From the looks of it with the way he mixes in Stewart, benching Deangelo when he's hot Fox still doesn't know what he has in Williams.

I'm happy to have Stewart but there is no reason to have a playmaker out of the game ever... That would be like benching Smith. Spelling Williams on occasion is fine, but why the hell park him for multiple series, I don't understand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm happy to have Stewart but there is no reason to have a playmaker out of the game ever... That would be like benching Smith. Spelling Williams on occasion is fine, but why the hell park him for multiple series, I don't understand.

It has happened more in the past 4 weeks, and really later in games.

I think the distribution in carries has been well done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He can’t even learn to run routes. No chance in hell he can do both that and pick up blocking schemes 
    • Well he had essentially a 70% completion rate for almost three thousand yards.  Biggest issues were awkward and inconsistent release.  I wouldn't call arm strength bad, but not great.    
    • I see him being better and most of that is a few downfield passes that were seemingly non existent.    But it is what is around him that has dictated the trajectory more than the quarterbacking. He is game manager level and unable to dictate to defenses.  And even if I am wrong and he is the reason we ‘upwarded’, we are bumping our heads on the ceiling and only making meager gains. If it is an incline it is awfully shallow degree wise. Like a finance graph that tracks your progress and hovers around the rate of inflation. Barely breaking even.  Is that where you want your money?  We make up these deadlines expectations and generally he does the minimum of what he needs to do to hang around.    It does not encourage me to believe that when we get into a game against a good run d that we cannot break down with our run game, to believe that we can pivot to the air and successfully counter their strategy.  But they run it back again. Of course I am gunshy of a repeat of the same thing we have watched for three years.    oh, and yes his durability is his most impressive positive for my money. I fear the other shoe dropping on that and the contractual consequences that will follow.   Last  of all, too late to edit my mistake here but would like to acknowledge it: the last three years has done very little to convince me that I was not wrong in not wanting him. One too many “not”s. 
×
×
  • Create New...