Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A positive way to look at next year...


davos

Recommended Posts

Considering the plausible outcomes: Fox remaining for one more season, resigning Peppers, and starting Moore...I don't see a reason to be doubtful for next season and this is why:

It is pretty much set in stone that Fox will be a free agent at the end of next season. This gives him every reason in the world to stack up and make our team next year as much of contenders as he can. Its simple...the more wins, the more lucrative contract he eventually lands. Also, the only way we would re-sign him is if we wind up in the NFC Championship at the least. So for now I ask any sane person in our fan base to not get so damn ansy about getting rid of Fox right now. I love you all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i personally don't understand the need for negativity for next season... it's pretty apparent that foxie is gone unless we go to the SB, which means he'll pull out all the stops to get there, which is good for us. i think we'll have the pieces in place for a good run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i personally don't understand the need for negativity for next season... it's pretty apparent that foxie is gone unless we go to the SB, which means he'll pull out all the stops to get there, which is good for us. i think we'll have the pieces in place for a good run.

Thank you & good point...

I'm pissed about this past year, but people need to look one step beyond.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...