Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

After the game at Boston...


lightsout

Recommended Posts

Should Whitney still be included in the trade list? I mean, yeah, we could potentially get some good players for him. But, the guy played his ass off. He is one of the more athletic guys on the team and a great leader from what we can all tell on the ice. I think we sign him to a 2 year extension once his contract his up (or restructure it this offseason to fit over the next few years before he is up for FA. Not sure what his contract is currently). And I'd be crazy if this game was a one time thing for him, but we know that the guy produces every week. Any other thoughts on this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to many sources, the Bruins are closing in on what should be the first trade of many as we head towards the March 3rd trade deadline. While no sources have been able to come up with any concrete names, I have heard that Carolina and Boston have stepped up discussions over the last few days and that Ray Whitney may be who the Bruins have their eye on.

He's a FA after this season and would be a rental to whoever gets him, thus maker the Canes a better team and there is a good chance he would sign back with us in the off season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Pitkanen is traded it will be because we ripped someone off bad. He probably wont go though, because there have already been a lot of calls about him and JR wants to include him in the nucleus of the team.

Whitney, Corvo, Cole, Wallin, Cullen etc.. anybody who's older is basically up for grabs.

Whitney is obviously the biggest trade deadline asset for this team, and barring something silly, I see him being traded. I believe he already stated he has no problem waiving his NTC if it will help the club.

He will be dealt to either LA or Vancouver, or something like that, play the rest of the season/playoffs and then sign back here in the Summer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whitney and Cullen were listed on TSN's list of the 10 most likely players to get traded. I see both getting traded here shortly. I still think someone blows carolina away and gets them to trade Pitkanen, IDK why but I think he gets traded. He's already got a lot of buyers and that will just heat up as we get closer to the deadline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's one of the best "available" options on the blue line. (Teams are only asking because we are so terrible) What else is there? Sheldon Souray? And even then, he has a NTC and his cap hit on a cup contender will be relatively large.

There are a lot of teams looking for blue line help, and there's just not a lot on the market. So yes, I could see it happening, but seriously Joni is one of the only people on the team that can move the puck.. much less back on the blue line. He's probably the best passer on the team, if not for Ray Whitney, and at worst he's the second best. He's one of the only reasons why our PP is not absolutely terrible, and he has good chemistry with a lot of the other young guys.

He is likely considered to be part of the core of the team by JR, and it would take a huge ripoff type of deal to move him I think.

There's another DMan I see moving way before Joni Pitkanen... and that's Dion Phaneuf. I'm just not sure the Flames want to give up on him until the Summer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh I expect that Phaneuf will be traded, I really think he wants out. Not sure why, but when that many rumors pop up about you wanting out and being traded, then somethings up.

This is list of players listed untouchable by Rutherford.

Eric Staal, Cam Ward, Brandon Sutter, Tim Gleason and Tuomo Ruutu. That's it, the whole list. Everyone else can be had and is available. While I think it would take a lot to get Pitaken, I also think there are going to be enough teams willing enough to give up something big that something will get done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hot damn went to the game tonight vs. the Islanders and man that was a lot of fun. We're starting to play some pretty good hockey as of late. Staal has 8 goals in 5 games since getting the C.

Forslund made a good point on the radio afterwards on 99.9 that as the team is playing better, it allows JR more bargaining power. It changes our perspective from a terrible team having a fire sale, to a team that's playing relatively well that has a few valuable pieces that are available. Could possibly get more for renting out guys like Whitney and Cullen in exchange for dropping from 1 or 2 to 4 or 5 in the draft. But if it's like they said, 1-6'ish in this year's draft is roughly the same thing. There's no Crosby or Ovechkin at the top of this years class.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's funny how the teams with the great QBs stay at or near the top of the league every season.  Yes it is a team game, but the QB has the biggest impact in most NFL football games. 
    • Look, no one is ever a perfect player.  Since the QB handles the ball on 100% of plays offensively (unless there's a direct snap to a RB or something), I can absolutely see where they get an outsized blame and gain from what happens at any given snap of a football game.   Theoretically, there shouldn't even be a stat or idea to a 4th quarter comeback or game winning drive because you should already have done that during the game.  Losers!  Right?  Just because you win late doesn't take away the fact you tried to lose the game for your team! I'm not a fan of that opinion, but again, I'm just a moron with a keyboard.   Bryce has limited tools.  Bryce has not inspired the same level of confidence in us as Cam Newton did in year 3.  I certainly get that.  We traded a TON of assets to get Bryce, and we still suck.  (I mean, since we've lost games, we're losers right?) I completely understand that some fans are just unhappy with a limited QB and a team that isn't performing well, unless the other teams are worse losers than we are. I will say this:  Bryce will fight until the end.  Sure, he's has some real loser football.   But in close games, he's doing his best to comeback (even against a winner of prevent D). Now is it better or worse if your QB plays their best ball in the first half and sucks 2nd half so long as they finish with 300 yards, 3 TDs for your fantasy points? Who said stats are for winners anyway?  The Panthers and Bryce has a long way to go.  I'm enjoying the winning right now.  Though I do start each game thinking "how will we fug this up today?" Because it's been such a poo show in the Tepper era.  Will he prove to be a legit starting NFL QB?  Maybe not here as evidence by our record with QBs who were high draft picks.  
    • Ive never liked the term game winning drives because they include games where the QB was part of or was the reason the team was behind in the first place. Ive been arguing against this stat since the Delhomme years. It should only count when the QB is out of the equation of reasons why the team fell behind in the first place and is at least half the reason why he led the last drive to give them a lead. It shouldnt count if they just hand it off most of the time and the RB is on fire and they go down and score a TD or FG.
×
×
  • Create New...