Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Chances of lockout = high


Murph

Recommended Posts

http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news;_ylt=AiDVaBXVB_tekC0WSYe_c2k5nYcB?slug=ap-superbowl-nflpa&prov=ap&type=lgns

Smith and Mawae said that if next season goes forward with no salary cap, it would be highly unlikely to have a new CBA with a cap reinstated.

“Virtually impossible,” Smith said.

“A very difficult task,” Mawae said.

Time to remove any denial from our minds. Whether there is a lockout or not, if 2010 goes uncapped, chances are very high there will never be a cap again. NFL will become MLB. Dallas will become the Yankees. The Redskins will become the Red Sox and Jacksonville will become the Royals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are rules in place to prevent things like that from happening. For a while I agreed that if a cap was removed then teams like Dallas/Redskins would run the league, but meh.

1) If you make it past the 1st round of playoffs you can't get a high value free agent unless you lose a high value player to free agency.

2) Even with an insanely stacked team the past 5 years Dallas has managed to do jack poo.

3) Carolina is on the upper end when it comes to overall value of the team(correct me if I'm wrong, not 100% sure on this.)

I'm not too worried.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are rules in place to prevent things like that from happening. For a while I agreed that if a cap was removed then teams like Dallas/Redskins would run the league, but meh.

1) If you make it past the 1st round of playoffs you can't get a high value free agent unless you lose a high value player to free agency.

2) Even with an insanely stacked team the past 5 years Dallas has managed to do jack poo.

3) Carolina is on the upper end when it comes to overall value of the team(correct me if I'm wrong, not 100% sure on this.)

I'm not too worried.

That is only in 2010. After that a new CBA will have to be created with new rules and apparently the union will not come to the table if a salary cap is part of the negotiations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Goodell today saud a deal would get done but it won't be soon (read uncapped 2010) but it will get done.

This is all posturing and a result of frustration that the players are being asked to take less of a percentage from 60% back to 55%. The owners are not giving in. Issues like a rookie cap, going to 18 games etc are all on the table and part of the solution. I would expect we won't get a solution until this time next year.

And I believe we will definitely have a cap once players find out that a number of teams are going to be dumping salaries now that there isn't a floor either. Everyone is trying to save money which is why we haven't tried to sign Peppers. A cap insures they spend a certain amount as well as not go beyond a certain ceiling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Man that sucks. If the NFL is uncapped, I doubt I will continue to watch for very long because like you said, The REdskins and Cowboys will become the Yankees and Sox, and we will become the Marlins...god dammit, these people make millions each year, the level of greed is atrocious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Marlins have won 2 championships, though. I mean, we'd probably only make the playoffs 2 to 3 times in a decade(like the Marlins), but when we go we'd be guarenteed to win it all. lol.

But yea, I hope they get something done. I need football and college football around here sucks to watch(except Wake Football, lol).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I originally hated the Miller deal but with the cap projected to rise nearly $10M next season the Canes struck some pretty good deals between Miller and Ehlers. Most of the team is locked in for the next few years. Nikishin will need an extension probably in the $6M AAV range. And Blake will need one if we don’t move him. Personally I’d move Blake, picks, and any prospect not named Nikishin/Nadeau/Artamonov for McTavish as I don’t see any any of the big time players moving teams next year. Realistically the Hurricanes should just target Gustavsson next year to fix the goal tending issue. But I’m all for moving Blake, picks, and prospects for McTavish this year. Ehlers - Aho - Jarvis Svechnikov - McTavish - Stankoven Martinook - Staal - Carrier Hall - Kotkaniemi - Robinson Jost - Jankowski Slavin - Miller Nikishin - Chatfield Gostisbehere - Walker Reilly Andersen Kochetkov I’d do Blake, Felix-Unger-Sorum, and 27 2nd for McTavish.
    • Very true on the length but stuff like this is never where we shine. We aren’t a good team at drafting.
    • Homerism aside, the more I see from Dan, the more impressed I am.  His player evaluation instincts. Last year his 2 premier FA signings, Hunt and Lewis COMPLETELY changed the line and I have a feeling his success in choosing blue chip guys will continue.  Look at the panthers’s rep for FA signings in the past. By and large, it’s been guys 1 year past their prime who had an injury and suckered our GM in to a crippling contract. We never get nice things. When was the last time this team signed 2 young blue chip studs  in the same offseason to contracts worthy of their impact? Ever?  Im telling y’all, players respect and trust Morgan. 
×
×
  • Create New...