Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rams will take Sam Bradford?.


scpanther22

Recommended Posts

they are stupid if the pass on suh. plus that means we might have to play against him if he falls to tampa

I think its the right move.Suh is a great player.But Suh is a DT.How many games a year can he win you??? a QB is a franchise player.Bradford in the right offense will be good IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Besides Clausen and Bradford, none of the QBs in this draft really have the potential to be franchise QBs. McCoy has a noodle arm, The Golden Calf of Bristol is The Golden Calf of Bristol, Jarrett Brown is still a huge unknown, Snead was awful last year, and there are a bunch of system, spread offense QBs.

Clausen has played in the west coast offense his whole college career and had ridiculous numbers despite not being surrounded with that much talent. The Rams have passed on Matt Ryan and Mark Sanchez the last two years, they cannot keep passing on franchise QBs and expect to win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The rams are in a bad position at #1. They could take the safe pick with suh, but they would be much better off trading it. Paying a busted Bradford a ton of money when he hasn't played in a year just sounds like a bad idea.

Now if they trade down and grab Bradford that isn't such a bad thing, plus they could still pick up a solid DT to continue building their D-line of doom.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm going to be real, the reason that vote ended up so lop-sided by the end was directly due to my programming. So there's nothing tongue in cheek about it. Also I left PFF after the Collinsworth acquisition (didn't want to move to Cincy) but have stayed involved in analytics via backdoor channels, but I can absolutely say that the experience was eye-opening, not because those guys are unquestionable football savants and that I became one by proxy, but because the amount of information that becomes available outside of what the typical fan has access to is revelatory and also really drives home how much context is still being missed even with all of that information. You don't discover that you know everything, you discover how much you still can't know no matter how hard you try, hence my point about the NFL not being able to figure out what makes a QB good. There's a lot of AI work going into that now and even that only seems to further confuse things vs. actually enlighten the problem. In the professional realm teams don't really talk about quarterbacks as A strictly being better than B, but how A can potentially perform better than B given a specific context of C. Of course those contexts may be wider for A than B, but there's also contexts where B can outshine A, even with lesser talent surrounding them. So what good teams strive to do is ultimately define a process of how they want their entire team to operate under schematically, find players that fit that scheme, and hopefully find a guy whose skillset will be maximized running that scheme with those players. Where bad teams fall of the wagon is constantly shifting those schemes and chasing bad fits or fads vs. sticking with a core identity and developing it.
    • there is a 100 mile long list of NFL players and coaches going to bat and defending horrible play from teammates.   
    • In 6 games, we've only had 6 hurries??? ... that can't be accurate
×
×
  • Create New...