Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Pats to franchise Cassel


Gazi

Recommended Posts

What team has significant cap room, draft picks available and needs a young QB with a decent resume?

Tampa would certainly be a fit, but I think the better fit might be in Detroit. Detroit certainly has a pick or two to toss at the Patriots in order to land Cassel and they desperately need a young QB to build the team around.

Detroit's also a good candidate to get Scott Pioli.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that Detroit is a solid choice to trade a pick for Cassel. Especially since they have two first rounders.

Kitna is probably gone and he is one of the few guys I wouldn't mind the FO getting in here to backup Jake and continue to groom Moore.

Don't laugh. Kitna is pretty good when he has some talent around him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not so sure that I trade him until I see how Brady rebounds from injury.

They almost made the playoffs, and would in normal years, they don't need the picks. Franchise him and keep going, then trade him if Brady is back to full strength and playing well. And if not, keep him and franchise him again, and start over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't be surprised if the Lions offered their second 1st round pick and the others required for a franchised player for Cassel, and the Pats say they want the Lions #1 overall pick in the draft.

I think the #1 may be a little too much .... I think that a Pats/Lions deal would probably involve 20 and 65. The Lions may be smart though that if NE wants the first overall to let them have it and save themselves the cap space.

But then again, a deal for Cassel may not happen til after the draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the part of your post that I have trouble wrapping my brain around :skep:

Yeah, but Millen is no longer around. Even though some of his underlings are now in control, they are the ones that suckered Jerry Jones into trading a first and third for Roy Williams. Gotta giv'em a little love for that one.

New Stadium - 1 Billion dollars

Contract to Roy Williams - Several million dollars

Being PWNED by the Detroit Lions front office - PRICELESS! :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, but Millen is no longer around. Even though some of his underlings are now in control, they are the ones that suckered Jerry Jones into trading a first and third for Roy Williams. Gotta giv'em a little love for that one.

New Stadium - 1 Billion dollars

Contract to Roy Williams - Several million dollars

Being PWNED by the Detroit Lions front office - PRICELESS! :D

I'll give you that :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean, but there is ample evidence that exists currently in the NFL and historically that if you have a talented or moderately talented team then one of the biggest upgrades you can make is at QB. It yields the biggest returns. I don't think even Prime Greg Olsen is going to make Bryce suddenly look like a stud QB. We have invested immense amounts of money on the OL and tremendous amounts of draft resources on WR's. And have added an additional extremely capable RB. At some point, the main problem is Bryce. We are at that point.  That being said, we don't need to go "Full Bryce" again and sell the farm to upgrade at QB. Be intelligent and patient. Try to get better by whatever means become available WHILE continuing to make the roster better. At the bare minimum, you slowly build an upper half of the NFL talented roster that is at least a potential draw for some free agent QB's. IMO, Bryce is clearly not the answer. I don't think anyone in our organization thinks that way but if they do, it's not the end of the world. Throw as many reasonable darts as you can through free agency and the draft until either you get a bullseye or a top 10-15 option becomes available in free agency.
    • I think the best way to make Bryce better is to make everyone around him better.  This is why I advocate for a stud (top 5, eventually) TE.  I mean, when we have been a good franchise, we have had a stud TE (Walls, Olsen) and ILB (Beason, Mills, Morgan, Luke, etc) so it is in our DNA.  Expect us to address these areas this year.  (An Olsen or Walls would help Bryce a lot).  In terms of productivity, I think we are going to work with XL for one more season and ride the TMac / Coker momentum.  Where else could we find a position to improve productivity?  TE.  A position that caters to Bryce's style and shortcomings, a stud TE gives him another weapon he has not had. The Panthers run a lot of 2-TE sets (I have seen 3) and they have a blocker (Tremble) who is great in the run game, a balanced TE (Evans), and Sanders is supposed to be the pass-catching TE. He had 340 yards last season and he has about 170 this year.  If we are going to play around with XL for another season, it only makes up to add to Bryce's weapons in a way that does not put XL on the bench, basically ending his development. It makes sense to bring in a pass-catching dawg.  The way the offense is designed, I see carrying 4, but its not ideal. Having said that, I mentioned Oregon's Sadiq in another thread, but I am starting to warm up to Vanderbilt's Stowers and, in the Olsen/Walls mold, I kinda like Endries from Texas.  Of course, Stowers is probably going in round 2 and Endries in 3 or later. I still say, 5 months before the draft, that I would not be surprised if we take a TE very early.
×
×
  • Create New...