Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Do you think we'll ever find a way to stop people from aging?


SmootsDaddy89

Recommended Posts

That would be sweet. Obviously not everyone would be able to enjoy the benefits though. Overpopulation and all that. Only important people.

It would actually be an awesome strategy for stressing the importance of staying in school.

"Stay in school and you wont ever die!!!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, the point is to get kids to at least graduate from high school so that we can pretend that they're more qualified to hold assorted minimum-wage jobs, duh!

I thought this thread was about immortality ....why bring up school in all this? are u high or something?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought this thread was about immortality ....why bring up school in all this? are u high or something?

I mentioned it because, like I said, you'd have to do something of significance to be allowed to live forever. We don't wanna overpopulate the planet.

For example, I plan on inventing a system you can install in your house which will punch Alex Trebek in the face whenever you clap three times in rapid succession.

Sort of like The Clapper, except ten times better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mentioned it because, like I said, you'd have to do something of significance to be allowed to live forever. We don't wanna overpopulate the planet.

For example, I plan on inventing a system you can install in your house which will punch Alex Trebek in the face whenever you clap three times in rapid succession.

Sort of like The Clapper, except ten times better.

lol...u have too much time on your hands

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't think they changed as much as you think between the INT and the final sack (immediate pressure with 4 linemen). They definitely stopped blitzing as much, if a blitz means rushing more than the front 4/5. They definitely did some exotic packages where they sent LBs/DBs and dropped linemen into coverage though. The fumble and INT were both blitzes. And yes they were successful. And yes, I agreed with Bryce not taking care of the ball. Really not many answers on those plays - just take the sack and live another play (unless you're Lamar). Which he didn't do. And no, you can't run prevent on the goal line. What's prevent defense to you? Alignment, personnel, cushion, etc.? Just curious. My reply was to the post that they sat back in some soft zone the whole game - until the end, when it mattered. That's not true. They blitzed, they disguised coverages and blitzers, they pressed, they bailed, they covered the flats, all of that. Not trying to argue. Just trying to inform. Actually they only blitzed once on the final drive, and the DB got away with a bad hold on Tremayne. Otherwise looked like it would have been a completion for a first down. The Cardinals' final drive defense looked a lot like the rest of the game.  I know it's easy to get upset after a lose (I'm guilty), but Mondays are when cooler heads prevail. Right? Emotions can make us seem like we don't know what we're talking about. The Huddle isn't supposed to be that. I always saw it as a place to go discuss the Carolina Panthers with more than the casual fan, and their emotionally charged opinions. I can get that at the local grocery store, where they don't know anything about NC/SC, let alone the Panthers. 
    • Poor guy went from the Ravens to this disaster
    • You have to make the best of it and find moments of happiness.  So, I picked up the Falcons D in my money league for this week. 
×
×
  • Create New...