Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers have won the last 5 against the Cardinals...


Zod

Recommended Posts

You also have to consider the fact that all our east coast games we a.m. games this is a p.m. game so that will help.

As far as motivation it's the playoffs if you can't get UP for this game you need to go home

What a LAME excuse...bwhaaaaaaa!! Time has nothin to do with if you are Good or not...if u r really good..it would remain that way no matter the time 9am..12pm..4pm...8pm..so come with another excuse because that one FAILED!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dude like you can compare this team to a team from 4-5 yrs ago when we started that losing streak. I think this will be a close game. If the weather is bad I think you nave a distinct advatage but if weather is good it will be just a little cooler than it is here so that should not be a prob.

I think with a week to prepare our d cord. can put together some very confusing front like we did vs Atl. It just depends on if the players can make the plays.

I don't think the weather will be a factor at all. It's not like New England, the worst you're going to see is a cold drizzle. No one wants to hear that excuse. The five game losing streak means jack too. This is the playoffs, where we've owned the Cowboys even though they kill us in the regular season. When it gets serious and big time players step up and make plays.

Your defensive coordinator isn't facing a rookie QB, we have one of the best playoff QBs in NFL history--look it up. In fact, the Panthers have a ton of playoff experience at every skill position on offense, and a coaching staff that knows what it takes to win. On defense we have playmakers at every level, and a much, much, much better secondary than Atlanta's. It's a good thing Warner has experience, but I don't see how it's enough. We've beaten him before in the playoffs, by the way.

So let's not talk about the weather. When you guys show up and get your beating we don't need excuses. Just acknowledgment that you faced a better team will work. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow guys defensive much

"So let's not talk about the weather. When you guys show up and get your beating we don't need excuses. Just acknowledgment that you faced a better team will work."

I was only commenting on a previous post about the weather never did I try to make it an excuse for playing poorly. However it is a known fact that it is harder to throw in the rain then it is on a clear day.

"What a LAME excuse...bwhaaaaaaa!! Time has nothin to do with if you are Good or not...if u r really good..it would remain that way no matter the time 9am..12pm..4pm...8pm..so come with another excuse because that one FAILED"

Again not using it as an excuse just stating a fact when you go from west to east you lose three hours. Going west to east you gain it. So common sense and a look at history shows that west coast teams playing on the east have more problems than the opposite. So much so that the NFL is looking into it this offseason. Not saying they should change it ut just the facts. Also you would know nothing about traveling from west to east seeing as your team is on the east would you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Canales has his msjor issue not doing the obvious regarding running Dowdle but with an average QB we would be in the playoffs with an average QB. 
    • 1. fug TikTak, I ain't clicking that stupid poo. 2. This is really very situationally dependent. Coaching is a huge part but sometimes you step into a scenario where a lot of building needs to happen that is largely out of your control  Recent examples(Last season's hiring cycle): 1. Ben Johnson Johnson chose the OVERWHELMINGLY best open coaching job due to a combination of solid ownership, a solid front office and the most talented roster of the open jobs from that cycle. Negatives were, insanely stacked division. Results have so far indicated that this coaching change has been a massive boost. 2. Mike Vrabel Vrabel went a different direction. He went to a franchise that has solid ownership, a mediocre front office and one of the worst roster in the NFL. However, he has a track record of NFL head coaching success AND lucked into one of the easiest schedules in NFL history(I believe 3rd easiest). Even with that caveat, a clear indicator that coaching has been a huge boost. 3. Pete Carroll Carroll chose one of the NFL's most voliate franchises. Notoriously bad ownership, very bad front office and a terrible roster. But, Carroll is a HOF caliber NFL HC with success at every stop. At the moment, coaching has not been able to overcome the apparent obstacles. In fact, it's been a complete diaster to the extent that Carroll has already fired multiple coaches. One could certainly argue that pethaps Pete has lost his touch but regardless, this coaching change didn't result in a turnaround and Carroll's future there seems in doubt. 4. Aaron Glenn Glenn's first HC opportunity was a doozy. Near worst ownership, a mediocre front office(at best) and a talented core group of players on an underwhelming roster. This experiment has been quite the ride to date. Glenn's personnel decisions have seemingly led to multiple close game losses(2-5 in games decided by one score or less) and the FO decided to have a roster firesale prior to the trade deadline for a wealth of draft capital. The question will be if Glenn will be given the time to actually see this future draft capital realized, now that a significant chunk of the talented core is not longer there. Coaching has not made a difference but is the franchise now setting him up to fail further? 5. Liam Coen Coen picked a mixed bag. Terrible ownership, a remade front office he essentially had a hand in selecting(or at the miminum influenced) and a middling roster. The early results show promise even if the roster shows significant flaws(and Coen shows visible frustration with his "franchise" QB every Sunday). Could be close to turning a 4 win team into a playoff berth. Coaching has mattered. 6. Brian Schottenheimer This was resoundingly viewed as a bad hire but it's also under challenging circumstances. Bad ownership in the sense that the ownership is also the front office, a future Tepper dream I assume. Very talented but very flawed roster. The initial results have been...interesting. A Cowboys team that was a bad 7-10 after a previous streak of three 12 win seasons is now....mediocre? Couple that with wild roster changes prior to the start of the season and up to the trade deadline and it makes for an incomplete picture. It's not much progress but it doesn’t appear to be regressing either. TBD. 6. Kellen Moore Moore chose the most challenging of all openings. The Saints are in the midst of a simulateous roster teardown and attempted rebuild. Decent ownership, a mixed bag in the front office(great at evaluating draft talent, less so in free agency and in salary cap management). The Saints have been awful but, they were expected to be awful. To that note, they were net sellers before the trade deadline. It was reported that Moore secured an agreement that this is long term building effort prior to taking the position so his status seems safe even while the team flounders week to week. Difficult to grade this now as the entire scenario seems to be a long term strategy. TBD.
    • I think he has started to build a culture here.  I think if we had a qb with no limitations we would be seeing a lot more with the offense.  I think most of the coaches that come in and instantly win went to teams that were underachieving previously based on roster talent level.  Based on our roster talent,  we werent underachieving,  we were just bad.
×
×
  • Create New...