Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

As of yesterday, Panthers currently 4th cheapest team in NFC...


Recommended Posts

Probably a good thing if your facing a lockout.

Good thing to unload over the hill players in an uncapped year.

Also will be sitting pretty when cap returns in 2011 as I think it will.

Very underbudget, very ready to sign young talent/resign young talent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good thing to unload over the hill players in an uncapped year.

Also will be sitting pretty when cap returns in 2011 as I think it will.

Very underbudget, very ready to sign young talent/resign young talent.

Guys...are we totally sure that we won't have to include cap penalties in future years from this year's cuts? I'm sure I've read in multiple places that any future cap will include the consequences of the uncapped year. Under normal conditions you spread the cap hit from cuts between the current year and next, so could be in for cap pain next year. Assuming they reach an agreement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree it's better not to spend with a pending lockout but it really makes you think about how if the Panthers splurged how stacked this team would be given the talent already retained with such low spending.

The Panthers could be unstoppable this year.

I'm just wondering why it takes the threat of a lockout for the Panthers to really do anything...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good thing to unload over the hill players in an uncapped year.

Also will be sitting pretty when cap returns in 2011 as I think it will.

Very underbudget, very ready to sign young talent/resign young talent.

Yep, getting rid of the 19 million dollar elephant in the room (Peppers) will instantly make your cap number look good.

Cowher will be very pleased when he takes over next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...