Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

MW2 vs. BFBC II


Carolina Husker

Recommended Posts

Yeah I dont agree. BC2 is hands down a better game. Maps are better and bigger, vehicles you get to drive/fly and hardly any screamy little kids.

MW2 requires very little team work, BC2 it's a must if you want to win. MW2 players only care about K/D ratio and camping long enough to get a nuke.

Add in the new maps to Rush, squad matches and the new maps just released (for free) its winner winner chicken dinner.

Fully destructible is super nice. It can change how you play or have to play.

Not a big fan of conquest, I like rush and squad death match.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rush is extremely conducive to campers, which was the biggest knock I heard about MW2.

I don't have that problem much. Once snipers realize they arent leveling up much they change what they do. Kills only net 50 points, unless you get a headshot or if its a mcom station defense kill.

It's also very hard to camp and be productive. The maps being so large that flanking and getting behind them is easy. Most snipers I see are newbs that don't contribute to the team.

Now recently I have been taking the recon kit and using the G3 assault rifle. I run around throwing out sensors while getting plenty of kills.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I went back to playing MW2 yesterday after playing BC2 since its release. It was so hard to adapt back to the overly cautious, camping mentality of MW2. I was getting owned left and right.

If the next Call of Duty somehow integrated full destructible environments, it'd make it a far superior game. Destructible environments eliminates a lot of camping.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...