Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

MW2 vs. BFBC II

Carolina Husker

By Carolina Husker,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

southcakalac Newbie

southcakalac

Posted
Posted

Yeah I dont agree. BC2 is hands down a better game. Maps are better and bigger, vehicles you get to drive/fly and hardly any screamy little kids.

MW2 requires very little team work, BC2 it's a must if you want to win. MW2 players only care about K/D ratio and camping long enough to get a nuke.

Add in the new maps to Rush, squad matches and the new maps just released (for free) its winner winner chicken dinner.

Fully destructible is super nice. It can change how you play or have to play.

Not a big fan of conquest, I like rush and squad death match.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
southcakalac Newbie

southcakalac

Posted
Posted

Rush is extremely conducive to campers, which was the biggest knock I heard about MW2.

I don't have that problem much. Once snipers realize they arent leveling up much they change what they do. Kills only net 50 points, unless you get a headshot or if its a mcom station defense kill.

It's also very hard to camp and be productive. The maps being so large that flanking and getting behind them is easy. Most snipers I see are newbs that don't contribute to the team.

Now recently I have been taking the recon kit and using the G3 assault rifle. I run around throwing out sensors while getting plenty of kills.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TerriblePizza Newbie

TerriblePizza

Posted
Posted

I went back to playing MW2 yesterday after playing BC2 since its release. It was so hard to adapt back to the overly cautious, camping mentality of MW2. I was getting owned left and right.

If the next Call of Duty somehow integrated full destructible environments, it'd make it a far superior game. Destructible environments eliminates a lot of camping.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • kungfoodude
      2025 Roster Cuts

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      It's definitely a historical issue at QB but to be perfectly blunt, we also don't do a good job of really developing almost any position if you look at the last decade or so. I tend to be on the side of that being far less a development issue than an evaluation deficiency.  I think we are in the situation at QB2/3 recently due to the overall roster being absolutely abhorrent and the QB classes being quite thin. It is harder to justify another Matt Corral(or several) when you can potentially get a real two deep contributor at other positions.  But, it was a lot of hard work to get to the point where are roster is so incredibly bad that luxury picks literally are not in our vocabulary.  This is the reaping what you sow portion of our history.
    • 45catfan
      2025 Roster Cuts

      By 45catfan · Posted

      That is what I meant about our front office. They are like someone filling out a March Madness bracket based on preference of uniform colors and mascots. There's no rhyme of reason to some of these fugg'n mind numbing decisions they make.  They go all in on these flimsy-@ss prospects and are gun shy when it comes to more solid prospects.  It's literally maddening and the reason I stopped being so emotionally involved in this team. Heck the only reason I'm active on the board today is one, it's my day off and two, it's cut down time.  
    • CarolinaLivin
      2025 Roster Cuts

      By CarolinaLivin · Posted

      Search Carolina Panthers 2025 Cuts in google. eliminates the bs for you
×
×
  • Create New...