Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Stale

Khyber53

By Khyber53,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Khyber53 Grand Master

Khyber53

Posted
Posted

Carolina isn't rebuilding right now. Rebuilding is much more drastic than what we are experiencing at this time. Rebuilding is what happens to perennial losers -- it starts with a coaching staff being jettisoned, the front office getting pink slips and then players getting axed by the new regime.

What is happening in Carolina right now is a team fighting a tendency that all good teams face: going stale. Stale is what we had become, and the better teams were beginning to show us how stale we were.

A team goes stale when their successful style of play or personnel grouping goes to the field too many times. Basically, the well-oiled, practiced plays become to commonplace and innovation drops off. And the good teams get book on you, or have enough game tape on you to know every nuance of your best plays. It results in the Cards picking you off five times in a game, or the Eagles getting six picks against you. Or they learn which plays your defensive end takes off, or which safety bites the hardest on a play action pass.

Or specifically for Carolina, what are the signs that you are setting up the draw play, or that Smith wants the smoke pass. Remember, the draw on third down used to be a sneak play and the smoke pass (wide receiver screen) was a novelty too, both designed to exploit tendencies in defenses now and then. But somehow, they became part of each Carolina game, three or four times a game most Sundays. It got stale, it got old, it wasn't a trick play anymore -- just a risky play if the defense knew it was coming.

It's not just the Panthers. McNabb and Westbrook weren't offering any new wrinkles to the game the Eagles played, but they did put the team into doing the same old plays again and again. And eventually, everyone had the book on the Eagles offense. It still worked against the chump teams or those with new coaching staffs, but not against the steady contenders and champs of the league.

So what do you do? Especially if you have a decent coach already under contract and a team that knows that coach's distinct style of play? You churn the players, cutting many and retaining the best of the young. You keep a cadre of good, smart players and surround them with folks you hope can execute the game plan.

What makes it fresh, when it works, is that even though it is the same old game plan, new players in the scheme find new wrinkles. Wrinkles that the other teams won't have tape on yet.

It's why the song "All Along the Watchtower" sounds so different between Bob Dylan, Jimi Hendrix and Dave Matthews -- same song, same notes (roughly) but the execution and arrangement are uniquely their own.

Close to home, we saw Stephen Davis and DeShaun Foster run great behind Brad Hoover's blocking, and then we saw that refreshed and regenerated with Williams and Stewart behind the blocking of Hoover. Sadly, letting Hoover go, however, may put more oomph into the rushing attack simply because no one really knows how Fiametta will throw his blocks.

On defense, the line had gotten very stale for us. Most teams knew how to bottle up our pass rush and the good ones could often take the phenomenal Peppers out of the game early. And teams learned to throw away from Gamble. We were once a defensive power, and we had become stale.

Let's not even talk about special teams... it shouldn't even be necessary when it comes to discussing stale.

So, we will have new blood in new positions next year. I don't expect our team's power running offense/ bend don't break defense strategy to change one bit. But it may very well look very different, very fresh next year.

At least I hope so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Khyber53 Grand Master

Khyber53

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Really? Wow. Nope, but I'll go read it.

Sorry CLTPanther, I can't find an article discussing the Eagles going stale. Won't say that there isn't, but I didn't catch it scanning those on the site. Was it in the discussion forums maybe?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Khyber53 Grand Master

Khyber53

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I really see it as a chance to come back to the passing attack that we used to have. Remember, once upon a time, Smitty regularly led the lead in WR stats and Moose even had the league tops in TDs one year under Fox.

A bit of freshening in the personnel could bring that back. As much as I hated to see Jake go, and probably Moose as well, it was time. I hope Moore and whoever (I still have little faith in Jarrett -- but I'd love to be surprised here) will put some new breath to this classic Air Coryell-type offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • CPantherKing
      So, just what is it that makes a QB "elite"?

      By CPantherKing · Posted

      I've explained this in more detail before. Briefly, there's a process to quickly evaluate a QB. Also, there's a type of QB that excels at a higher rate than others at the pro level. After that, it's about keeping the QBs flowing through the system. 1st round QBs are not superior, they just get more reps and game time. You can find just as many competitive QBs that are 3rd day or undrafted if you give them the same reps and game time. Now, to dive deeper for fun. To understand this further, there are rare 1st round QB exceptions, but they must come with a pro pedigree and proven success in college. There's only 1 to 3 of these QBs every decade (John Elway 1983, Peyton Manning 1998, Eli Manning 2004, Andrew Luck 2012, Jared Goff 2016, Patrick Mahomes 2017, and Joe Burrow 2020. That's 1 of every 20 1st round QBs (5% of historical 1st round QBs in modern draft era). When you look at 1st rd QB success, eliminate these rare ones from your samples because they are trained to be championship QBs. 100% of them have taken their team to a championship. Also, the Bill Walsh tree knows the formula for building an offense and finding a QB QUICKLY. The question is why haven't others figured it out & continue to waste draft capital on QBs? Based on my QB evaluation system, here's the QBs I had slotted for the Panthers over the past 10 drafts. Patrick Mahomes, Brad Kaaya, Cooper Rush, Lamar Jackson, Brett Rypien, Tyler Huntley, Jalen Hurts, Shane Buechele, Desmond Ridder, Brock Purdy, Aqeel Glass, Jack Coan, Aidan O'Connell, Tanner McKee, Spencer Rattler, Devin Leary, Sam Hartman, Quinn Ewers. The ones in bold were the ones that rated the highest for pro championship qualities (probable franchise QBs). Obviously,  we didn't need them all, but it's about flow of pro championship qualities shown in college and not the most physically gifted. Also, there are a few QBs every decade who have the qualities, but never get a chance. If you're talent evaluation/QB system is good enough, you can go get 2 to 3 of them tomorrow to show what they can do when their name is called. I expect 1 of every 6 QBs to be worthy of being a franchise QB. There's strict rules to the depth chart qualifications, rotation, minimum KPIs and cuts/trades for me. Panthers have had Collins, Beuerlein, Weinke, Delhomme, Clausen, Newton, Bridgewater, Darnold, and Young. If you include Lewis, Peete, Allen and Mayfield, the Panthers have had 3 of 13 championship level franchise QBs. 1 of 5 (1 of 6 if you don't count Collins). It's the same for every franchise. The difference is a certain coaching tree knows how to move them through quicker than all the others while building defense with the most valuable draft picks. For Walsh, Montana(3rd rd) was his 3rd QB and Young(trade) was his 12th (9 yrs). He had a process allowing him to move through them rapidly. For Holmgren, Favre(trade) was his 4th QB and Hasselbeck(6th rd/trade) was his 15th QB (10 yrs). Neither of them settled on or tried to solve the problems of their 1st QB. For Andy Reid, McNabb(1st rd) was his 2nd QB and Mahomes(1st rd) was his 15th QB (19yrs). For John Harbaugh, Flacco(1st rd) was his 1st and Jackson(1st rd) was his 8th (11 yrs). For Sean McVay, Goff(1st rd) was his 1st and Stafford(trade) was his 5th (5yrs). Reid was the slow and stubborn one who wouldn't move on from his QB & had to wait nearly 2 decades to grab a QB that is the rare exception. I present this to show how 1st round picks are wasted on QBs, and it's the process fitting the QB to the system that generates success. Championship leader qualities and a process to move through QBs for a single coach's offense until you find a winner is the formula. The ages of these QBs from the Walsh tree when they won their first SB: Montana(25), Young(33), Favre(27), Mahomes(24), Flacco(27), and Stafford (33). Mahomes is the only sports pedigree QB exception on this list. QBs selected in the top 20 picks that weren't a pedigree QB were discarded by the team that drafted them. It will continue to be the same for the QB position as the dynamics of an offense from coach to field to team to clutch moments are not going to change. The combines/draft is just a media show that will only highlight the rare pedigree exceptions at QB for the NFL. You can line up ANY 12 QBs demonstrating success in college with the pro championship level qualities right now & you'll find a couple franchise QBs. Overrated arm strength & athleticism mean absolutely nothing for success at the pro level (that's a bonus). If they had enough of the tangibles to consistently succeed in college, it will translate to the pros. Currently, the Panthers are on QB #1 being shoved into Canales' system. Hooker is Canales' 4th QB (5th if you count Bryce Perkins). The Panthers only need to get Young out of the way and start giving these QBs a shot. If a GM can't fit a QB with the offensive coach in 6 QBs, then it's time to move to a new GM. For Canales' system, I'd go with Cooper Rush(trade), Tyler Huntley(available/ps), Desmond Ridder(available), Jack Coan(available), Aqeel Glass(available), Tanner McKee(trade), Sam Hartman(available/ps), Devin Leary(available), Hendon Hooker(on roster), Clayton Tune(available/ps), Chris Oladokun(available/ps), DJ Uiagalelei(available/ps) and Shane Buechele(available/ps). No particular order. This just demonstrates the winning process at QB to build a winning team. 7 of these QBs have been chosen by SB winning coaches. The point is to line them up and have one head coach with one offensive system move through them as quickly as possible until one of them holds on to the starting position with success and claims the franchise QB title. I expect the top 20 1st round picks for a franchise QB is the only way crowd to attack this and the Bill Walsh tree. Likely going to tell you that 6th round & later QBs as well as the Walsh tree are the sole outliers. We can count more 6th round and later championship QBs(13) than we can the 1st round pedigree QBs(7). As for the other 47 SB QBs, only 15 QBs have been drafted in the top 20 and led their first team to the SB. The best return is the pedigree 1st round QB, but this is rare. As for top 20 pick QBs that aren't pedigree, you're better off running 6th round and later QBs through the offensive system as quick as possible while spending that top 20 1st round pick on core defense or the rare dual threat skill position player. I don't expect the typical media driven fan to agree. I know SB winning coaches keep signing my college QB targets.
    • Jay Roosevelt
      MNF double header

      By Jay Roosevelt · Posted

      Best QB I've seen this year so far, with all due respect to Allen and Jackson.
    • PNW_PantherMan
      MNF double header

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      What’s with the chargers run game?  They were good last year 
×
×
  • Create New...