Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Proof baseball is unbelievably boring


Goosfraba21

Recommended Posts

Mets and Cardinals tied at 0-0 bottom of the 16th inning!!! WTF!! Couldn't even watch cops tonight because of this snooze fest. No Im not watching I switched it to fox to see what was on and this game is STILL on. The game started at 4:00. 6 hours later the game is still on? I'd rather get my balls waxed then sit through that. Just sayin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is nothing boring about extra innings baseball. The game can turn in one swing of the bat. That's edge of your seat material, not a snooze fest.

The stadium was empty when the game finished. More like leave your seat material. 20 innings and over 7 hrs. At one point the Cardinals had their short stop pitching. Real exciting stuff......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I admit I am not much of a baseball fan unless I get to sit in the stands and drink beers and stare at hotties...that being said...much respect for the game!! April and they play 20 innings to determine a winner...thats awesome! Every other league can learn something here...you wanna put a tick in the W column, keep playing until someone earns it...by the same rules you played the rest of the game!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mets and Cardinals tied at 0-0 bottom of the 16th inning!!! WTF!! Couldn't even watch cops tonight because of this snooze fest. No Im not watching I switched it to fox to see what was on and this game is STILL on. The game started at 4:00. 6 hours later the game is still on? I'd rather get my balls waxed then sit through that. Just sayin.

50.00 says you are horrible with foreplay. :coolgleamA:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • First, am I wrong? I looked back over all his posts here and I didn't see anything positive other than Shough. Second, pretty sure if you had read the post I was responding to, you would have seen CRA made poo personal as well . You just choose to address me instead of him. Not sure why?????
    • I wanted XL but I felt he should have been a 2nd rounder but I understand the logic trading up just to get the option. A safety net for your gamble.    Certainly disappointed with his receivers development but i like his down field blocking and I imagine that's what's keeping him on the field. 
    • Pretty sure it is a given Young lacks typical QB size and strength and he is here simply because his other attributes more than make up for it. My point is not to indicate anyone "settled" for him but rather to remind people that there have been plenty of big, strong QB's that have not lived up to expectations. Jamis Winston, Anthony Richardson, Trey Lance, JaMarcus Russel are a few examples. They all have the physical attributes coveted by teams and yet none have had sustained success in the NFL. And yes, there are QBs that do have both but there aren't many and some of the ones still playing were failures with their early teams. Saying Young is a bust simply based upon his size (and I do think it is as simple as that for a few guys around here) is unfair to both him and the team.
×
×
  • Create New...