Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Contact Lens Question...


Johnny Rockets

Recommended Posts

So I recently took one step closer to admitting that I am getting old and went to the eye doctor for the first time in my life. I actually failed the eye exam 1 1/2 years ago when I went to renew my driver's license but they let me slide.

Anyway, I have a stigmatism and got some contacts that I have worn over the weekend. I have to go back for a checkup tomorrow and I will be getting a larger supply of lenses. I know that the type of lenses I need are a bit more expensive and the girl gave me an estimate of about $280 (with insurance) for a years supply of lenses and then there was a $60 rebate on top of that so it would be around $220 for a year. Sounds pretty good to me but is there a downside to ordering a years worth and should I look into ordering from the internet instead of through the doctor's office?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

never had any experience with ordering on the internet, but I sure see them advertising lots. Can't see any downfall to that if you know exactly what you want.

$220 for a year doesn't sound too bad either really...but I have to go on what I pay up here of course. I wear glasses to work, so I buy daily contacts for occasional use and weekends so a three month supply lasts me a long long time!!! Last batch cost me $90 I believe, for 3 months, and I also have a stigmatism.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Internet is usually the same price plus you need to get the Dr's prescription to send to the company, easier to get them from the Dr. No real downside to order a year if you get that amount back unless your eyes do something crazy and get really bad within that year which is very unlikely.

I will be bringing you a present in 2 weeks after we return from Memphis old man! It should be large enough that you won't even need those contacts.:piggy:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

JR, I have astigmatism too and I went the contacts route two years ago. I buy the year's supply and keep them in a drawer and change them out every two weeks. When I got them, the year's supply was a better deal with the rebate than the other plans that were available. The one upside to it (and this has happened to me) is when one tears, you have another one right there as a backup ready to go. If that happens and you run out at the end of the year, the doctor will usually give you a trial pair for free. At least my doctor here in Belmont does that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah I was crying about this earlier in the year when we got to 6 wins. Equal number to Wilks.  We are still a QB away. 
    • Hey y'all, a topic that has been on my mind has always been the parallels between two of the best quarterbacks in the history of the NFC South and ultimately their place in history and how they are viewed moving forward through the rest of NFL history. These two quarterbacks as you might have guessed are their respective franchises greatest signal callers, Cam Newton and Matt Ryan.  Cam Newton (144 Games Started): 269 TDs (1.8 per contest), 123 INTs, Super Bowl Appearance, OROTY, MVP  Matt Ryan (234 Games Starter):  394 TDs (1.6 per contest), 183 INTs, Super Bowl Appearance, OROTY, MVP  Obviously on first glance, these are very similar players with identical top accomplishments. Let's zoom in a little bit on their surrounding talent. C Cam Newton top offensive producers:  Greg Olsen (TE) (9 Seasons) (3 Pro Bowls) Steve Smith Sr. (WR) (3 Seasons) (1 Pro Bowl) Matt Ryan top offensive producers:  Julio Jones (WR) (10 Seasons) (7 Pro Bowls)  Roddy White (WR) (8 Seasons) (4 Pro Bowls)  Tony Gonzalez (TE) (5 Seasons) (4 Pro Bowls)  Wow, quite the difference here. Through Cam's career his top option was Greg Olsen, who was one of the best tight ends of his generation and a real difference maker in an offense reliant on their quarterback making plays outside of structure. Newton post Steve Smith Sr was saddled with a revolving door of Chicken McNobodies at the receiver position and the offense had to be funneled through the tight end and running attack as Jericho Cotchery, Corey Brown, Jason Avant, Kelvin Benjamin, etc was not getting the job done. Ryan on the other hand was consistently surrounded with top level offensive weapons, including one of the best receivers and tight ends in the history of the game, thanks in part to an aggressive general manager who wanted to ensure they could maximize the arm talent of their franchise quarterback.  How about protection?  Cam Newton top offensive lineman: Jordan Gross (3 Seasons) (1 Pro Bowl)  Ryan Kalil (8 Seasons) (2 Pro Bowls) Andrew Norwell (4 Seasons)  Trai Turner (6 Seasons) (5 Pro Bowls) Matt Ryan top offensive lineman:  Jake Matthews (8 Seasons) (1 Pro Bowl)  Alex Mack (5 Seasons) (3 Pro Bowls)  Andy Levitre (3 Seasons)  Todd McLure (5 Seasons)  While Matt Ryan certainly had more consistency and high level talent on his offensive line, one could argue they had similar protection through the bulk of their career. Though one has to acknowledge some of the absolute dog water lineman that were trot out to protect Newton at his tackle spots post Jordan Gross retirement. Byron Bell, Mike Remmers, Matt Kalil, Chris Clark, Amini Silatolu, Nate Chandler, etc were all a collective pile of garbage save for two seasons from Remmers and a few splashes of brilliance from Michael Oher, Daryl Williams, and early career Taylor Moton.  Defense should be fairly simple.  Cam Newton defense average rank:  17th/32 Matt Ryan defense average rank:  18th/32  Honestly I was a bit surprised by this, I had thought Cam consistently had the better defenses, but when you look at the average it's shockingly close. While Newton did have the higher peaks of defense, Atlanta placed higher more consistently and only really faltered towards the end of Ryan's career. Both these players had on and off again defenses to rely on.  So what does all this mean?  1. I am bored at work  2. Cam Newton has the better body of work given the talent around him  While I am not sure either is necessarily a lock to get a gold jacket, it's undeniable that Newton carried his franchise on his back for the better part of his career and changed how quarterbacks are viewed as a whole. Newton became the blueprint for a new breed of signal caller, and Ryan is the standard that is set for pocket quarterbacks in the modern league. Both players deserve their kudos for what they did for their franchises and how they morphed their team's identity, but Newton I think was clearly the better of the NFC South quarterbacks, especially if he had remained as healthy as Ryan did. 
    • 100% agree, trading him would be the best possible scenario. It allows for a clean start at QB and you get something back.
×
×
  • Create New...