Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Scarface on BET


Captroop

Recommended Posts

So I was watching Scarface the other night on BET, and it was single-handedly the most unpleasant experience of my life. Not the movie; the censorship!

It was terrible, half the time the screen was zoomed way it, like you could tell they were trying to crop the image of something unpleasant off the screen because the resolution went to shiz. When he was at his desk at the end, all you could see was his face because they zoomed in to crop the image of the mountain of coke. Oh, and the ignominy of watching him snort coke, with the sound of the snorting removed. What, are we supposed to think he rubbed his nose on a powder donut for some reason?

And the penultimate gunfight at the end was (I shiz you not) two minutes long. I remember looking at the clock and going, "It's 10:57 and this movie is supposed to end at 11? There's like 10 minutes left." The gun fight was basically in fast forward. "Say Hello to my little friend!" Bang! Bang! "I'm Still Standing!" Guy in sunglasses. BOOM! The end.

Wtf?

So my question is, if a movie is so objectionable that you have to cut our half of it to air it on your crappy network, why the hell are you airing it in the first place!? Scarface is about murder and drugs. If you cut out the murder and drugs, what's left? Why are you even showing the movie? Fug censorship in the ear, and all the whiny kids and hippie parents who make it "necessary."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw this too and was thinking the same thing. Scarface is such a classic movie that unless you can play it after like 2am on network television or get it on HBO/CineMax/Starz or Showtime you just shouldn't show it because of the amount of censorship it requires to make it agreeable to a regular TV audience. That movie is ruined by censorship.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I was watching Scarface the other night on BET, and it was single-handedly the most unpleasant experience of my life. Not the movie; the censorship!

It was terrible, half the time the screen was zoomed way it, like you could tell they were trying to crop the image of something unpleasant off the screen because the resolution went to shiz. When he was at his desk at the end, all you could see was his face because they zoomed in to crop the image of the mountain of coke. Oh, and the ignominy of watching him snort coke, with the sound of the snorting removed. What, are we supposed to think he rubbed his nose on a powder donut for some reason?

And the penultimate gunfight at the end was (I shiz you not) two minutes long. I remember looking at the clock and going, "It's 10:57 and this movie is supposed to end at 11? There's like 10 minutes left." The gun fight was basically in fast forward. "Say Hello to my little friend!" Bang! Bang! "I'm Still Standing!" Guy in sunglasses. BOOM! The end.

Wtf?

So my question is, if a movie is so objectionable that you have to cut our half of it to air it on your crappy network, why the hell are you airing it in the first place!? Scarface is about murder and drugs. If you cut out the murder and drugs, what's left? Why are you even showing the movie? Fug censorship in the ear, and all the whiny kids and hippie parents who make it "necessary."

why are they showing it? you watched it didn't you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The last half hour. Had I watched from the beginning, I would have tuned out much sooner.

*Edit*

And if you're really going down the "well they got your viewership, so they must know what they are doing," you should know that seeing what a movie on BET has greatly decreased my probablility of every watching a movie on that network again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The last half hour. Had I watched from the beginning, I would have tuned out much sooner.

*Edit*

And if you're really going down the "well they got your viewership, so they must know what they are doing," you should know that seeing what a movie on BET has greatly decreased my probablility of every watching a movie on that network again.

yea no doubt, i'm just saying. If you're upset by the general quality of television there's nobody to blame but the viewership, people don't demand quality so this is what people get. Hell, HBO doesn't even show letterbox films because people apparently don't care.

Alot of times with big movies like Scarface a larger network will pay to cut and pan/scan it and then as they move on will sell that recut to smaller networks. Then these smaller networks will then recut for run-time or whatever. These old cuts are done by crappy editors and the dub quality is really poor, add that to the general shittiness of pan/scan and you have a really crappy product that resembles more a rough arbitrary assembly than an actual film. But hey, it's scarface...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah and I am doubtful he can offer that consistently. I don’t have many years left at my age and in my view we have wasted two and this whole exercise with him was always a three year minimum.  I am out on that with a guy I don’t believe in, and never believed in, it has sucked. To me it is a costly detour off the right track. Years.    But I am not so rigid that I can’t see excellence. He needs to display it though, consistently before I change my outlook.  
    • No, when I said rage, I meant rage, which only applies to certain fans on this board. Your timeline of trying to assess whether he is the future or not is really tied to the discussions surrounding his second contract. If this team is going to commit to some monster contract while he has shown nothing but glimpses of brilliance would be deservedly worrisome, so the clock is genuinely ticking for him to settle into something resembling his final form. Perhaps a best case scenario is that he plays well, the team succeeds, but he does so with a more limited role that makes the rest of the league view him as a game manager, and his second contract value reflects that. Then he continues to improve and becomes a bargain comparatively while not handicapping the team around him, and we enter an era of consistent championship competitiveness that the fanbase has craved for decades and has never really experienced before. But that requires many, many things to go right and for Bryce himself to facilitate that if he ends up being the quarterback of the future.
    • Exactly. And the flame throwers as well, get location benefits from not going all out. But they have it in reserve.  Not sure how much Greg had but he was an artist.  There was a YouTube I came across last year or maybe even 2023 and I don’t how to even find now but it had two NFL QBs I want say one was Carr from the Raiders but I don’t really remember  The point of it is they stood side by side throwing identical distances to identical targets. Radar gun was used.  They threw the normal effort (not all out) and it was measured etc. Then they were asked to throw their ‘fastball’. They were missing and most often they were missing high. It demonstrated the same principle.    edit: and applying that to arm strength, give me the guy that doesn’t need max effort to have good velocity. The margins are so narrow with less velocity in tne NFL the defenders can Close on it and this is a league where they value down to the 100th of a second level. It is that tight 
×
×
  • Create New...