Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Just a thought: Diop/Diaw for Arenas??

bLACKpANTHER

By bLACKpANTHER,
in Charlotte Hornets

Recommended Posts

bLACKpANTHER Proficient

bLACKpANTHER

Posted
Posted

No Rumor or anything even out there- but i know the Wiz are going to try and unload him with Wall and Heinrich on their squad..

Wiz need help down low and we could unload Diop and Diaw on them..

PG: Arenas - DJ

SG: Jax - Henderson

SF: Wallace - ???

PF: Thomas - Brown

C: Chandler - Nazr

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BF91 Newbie

BF91

Posted
Posted

If the Wiz need help down low then Diaw and Black Shrek aren't going to do much for them. Diaw is more of a point forward and Diop is well, Diop. Bobcats Baseline had a very similar trade as one of their offseason scenarios, and I have to say that I don't like it. I'd rather wait out Diaw and Diop than put faith in Arenas' knees. Besides, what happens when Jackson finds the guns that Arenas has in his locker?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bLACKpANTHER Proficient

bLACKpANTHER

Posted
  • Author
Posted

We would be a billion bucks over the luxury tax with Arenas's huge contract.

if we clear Diop and Diaw- Arenas' contract would be fine.. anyways, i kinda agree that I would rather hold onto Diaw than gamble on Arenas- even if it means getting rid of Diop

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BF91 Newbie

BF91

Posted
Posted

if we clear Diop and Diaw- Arenas' contract would be fine.. anyways, i kinda agree that I would rather hold onto Diaw than gamble on Arenas- even if it means getting rid of Diop

No it wouldn't. Arenas will make $17,730,694 next year. Diaw and Diop together will make $15,478,600 next year. The difference in those two salaries, assuming we re-sign Thomas, would push us into the luxury tax.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Navy_football
      Carolina Still Not Respected

      By Navy_football · Posted

      I guess so. Don't think I was involved with previous discussions.  Tepper is one of the newest owners in the NFL. Dan is going into his 3rd season as a GM - ever. Dave is going into his 3rd season as a HC - ever. Before becoming a HC, he was an OC/playcaller for one season total. Idzik is about to go into his 1st year as a play caller - ever. WRs are rookies, sophomores and 3rd year guys - though the experienced 3rd year guys are XL and Coker (who has missed a ton of games). TEs are guys going into their 2nd and 3rd seasons, and Tommy Tremble - though Sanders has missed a ton of games. QB has played 3 years. Chuba is an experienced RB, but Brooks and Etienne have taken very little snaps at the position. O-line is more experienced vets with some talent - which is HUGE. Need them to stay healthy. I mean the offense is very young in every aspect except O-line. You see it differently?
    • electro's horse
      The "now it's been three years" Grade for the 2023 Draft

      By electro's horse · Posted

      probably the 2nd worst draft in team history
    • tukafan21
      Strength of Schedule

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I said this ALL last season and will say it again this year. Our record means diddly squat this year, I don't care if we have 0 wins or 17 wins, I only care about one thing and one thing only. Bryce proves without a shadow of a doubt that he IS or ISN'T our long term solution at QB. It's the only thing that matters for the same reason it sucks that this is the same thing as last year.  This needs to be determined, and if they can't determine it, then it's still telling the team the answer, just not the one they want to hear. As right now we're in the ultimate QB purgatory, a position that dooms franchises for years.  Just look at a team like the Cardinals, who extended a better QB and it still screwed them over and haven't had a contending team in a long time. People get too caught up on wins and losses when evaluating players, particularly QBs.  When people look at the final record and use that as a reason to want to extend a QB or not is just a fools errand.  If we had lost 2-3 more games last year because we didn't make a last second FG, I genuinely wonder if we would have just moved on from Bryce this offseason (like we should have been doing anyways IMHO).
×
×
  • Create New...