Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Today's office debate: Best American band RIGHT NOW

pstall

By pstall,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

Zod Grand Master

Zod

Posted
Posted

Lol. As soon as you or anybody you know are capable of doing what they are, you be sure to let me know.

So you feel a band is talented if they can do something that someone who is not in a band can't do?

Yeah, real high talent bar you have there.

lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DirtyMagic97 Newbie

DirtyMagic97

Posted
Posted

So you feel a band is talented if they can do something that someone who is not in a band can't do?

Yeah, real high talent bar you have there.

lol

Haha I feel a band is talented because they can do what 95% of bands can not do.

This argument is a moot point. You don't like the music, so you will say they have no talent. Most people are that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Zod Grand Master

Zod

Posted
Posted

Haha I feel a band is talented because they can do what 95% of bands can not do.

This argument is a moot point. You don't like the music, so you will say they have no talent. Most people are that way.

95% of bands can do what they do, they just choose not to because its tripe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Zcustom Newbie

Zcustom

Posted
Posted

My biggest problem with Tool and Perfect Circle is they (Maynard) seem to go out of their (his) way to make the music as inpenatrable and unaccesable as they (he) possibly can. It like he thinks that its a game with the fans and if he doesn't put at least two tracks on each disc that makes people scratch their head and say WTF he has lost.

They flirt with pure genius on some tracks and then others are just total garbage.

It's the sort of general malaise that the insane lament and the genuis possess.

I get your point, and you're right. Part of Tool's success has always been their inaccesability, people want what they think they aren't supposed to have.

Sometimes I wonder if it's just a byproduct of the drug use, cuz he's on something strong. Take track 12 on Aenima for instance, it's just a baby crying, WTF, but the next track is legendary.

Either way, if it takes a couple tracks of WTF to get to the genius stuff, I'm good with that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • kungfoodude
      C Mc. Gotta love this guy!!

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      TBH, these are the kind of players that get weeded out of professional sports pretty quickly. Also, CMC is not that guy. There is zero indication that he isn't competitive. 
    • kungfoodude
      Teddy Checkdown in trouble

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      I like the free agency. It actually helps basically all schools across the board. Pretty much only ancient HC's and/or HC's that haven't been able to adjust have been complaining about the free agency. Your fortunes can be made or broken every offseason. It's not like before where a bad recruiting class or two meant multiyear purgatory.  I will never understand all the bellyaching about the NIL. If you want to talk about what ruined college athletics, it has been naked greed. Conference expansions for TV revenue, ever skyrocketing AD and facilities costs and now the attempts to permanently ruin the postseasons(football and basketball).  All the kids did was get a very well deserved piece of a very, very, VERY broken pie.
    • tukafan21
      Scourton isn't signed (& apparently it's a thing)

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Nobody is saying they don't count against the cap, because yes, they technically do count against the cap as it's money the team is paying and it needs to be accounted for. But what you're not grasping it seems is that if a player gets $10 million guaranteed in their contract, whether they get literally $0 as a signing bonus or $8 million as a signing bonus, it doesn't change the overall cap hit of the contract, because cap hits are about the guaranteed money, not how much is paid up front. The only thing that how much is paid up front changes, is how the cap hit can be spread out amongst the years. So yes, technically there could end up being a slightly bigger cap hit in year 3 and 4 due to a bigger signing bonus, but if that is the case, it also means there will be a lesser cap hit in years 1 and 2 than there would have been with a smaller bonus.  But over the length of the contract, the size of the signing bonus has literally zero affect on the overall cap hit of the contract, because THAT part of it is 100% about the guaranteed money and nothing else.
×
×
  • Create New...