Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mark Ruffalo to play Hulk


Jangler

Recommended Posts

And Jeremy Renner as Hawkeye.

http://www.nme.com/movies/news/mark-ruffalo-to-play-the-hulk-in-the-avengers/179490

Mark Ruffalo is reportedly in talks with Marvel Studios to play The Hulk in Joss Whedon’s The Avengers. The role was played by Edward Norton in the 2008 movie The Incredible Hulk, but it was confirmed that he would not be reprising it for The Avengers. Deadline is now reporting that the Eternal Sunshine Of The Spotless Mind actor is in line to take over.

The film, written and directed by Buffy The Vampire Slayer TV series creator Whedon, and produced by Iron Man director Jon Favreau, is an adaptation of the popular Marvel Comic series The Avengers, which features a team of superheroes including The Hulk, Iron Man and Captain America.

The film already has an impressive cast, including Robert Downey Jr and Don Cheadle reprising their roles as Iron Man and War Hero respectively, Chris Evans as Captain America, plus Samuel L Jackson, Scarlett Johansson and Jeremy Renner also co-starring.

Confirmed here at Comic-Con.

http://www.zimbio.com/Mark+Ruffalo/articles/m7T1twdcKDF/Mark+Ruffalo+Confirmed+Play+Hulk+Avengers

MarvelStudiosCaptainAmericaFirstAvengerE-FWuULQ2Til.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the worst news ever. I could not think of a worse person to play Bruce Banner. I just dont like this at all, but I will wait to see how he does. I dont hate him as an actor, but I dont like him either. He is good for romantic comedies, but not as the Hulk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...