Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Time to embrace the change? (3-4)


Kse50

Recommended Posts

I'm pretty sure I actually saw someone else mention it, but we have the personel, and would be able to bring Harris up to play the big run stopper he is.

JMO, and I doubt it happens, but i'm keeping my fingers crossed. I would hope that Pep would actually be excited about the many things he could do at OLB in a 3-4 scheme as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's the coaches some of our current and former players disagree with.(and rightfully so)

I don't think it is just the scheme, you can still do a 4-3 and change up how we do things.

Going to a 3-4 just because won't really do anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We probably need our linebackers to be a little bigger. But you look at Pittsburgh and Baltimore and they have excelled in the 3-4. Plus we'd be the only team in our division to use this. We are already short at talent at DT so it would help there. But like I said, we need bigger linebackers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And Fiz, I thought we were close to getting Peppers back?

While he's scheduled to be an unrestricted free agent on March 1, the reality is the franchise tag looms in his future, either for them to keep him or to maintain leverage in an effort to trade him for picks.

"Ideally, I want to be in the best situation possible for myself and this organziation," Peppers said. "I’m thankful for everything they’ve done for me, and I don’t want to leave them crippled or in a bad situation, and I don’t want to do that to myself either.

"Whatever works out best for both sides is what I’m comfortable with."

what do you think

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The difference is about how much player input is allowed and encouraged in the decision making process. Top down teams tend to dictate to players how everything is handled. Disagreements are handled by the coach and players are expected to do what they are told regardless of what they think or feel.  Players are perceived as commodities to be used until we find better. In player led teams player input is encouraged and valued. Players and especially leaders are expected to settle their own disagreements and be accountable to the team but mostly to each other. Players are family to be appreciated and supported in their growth. Is the reality of football the same in both? Yeah there are limited positions, football is a business and winning is the bottom line. Coaches get final say and run the program because that is their job. But in player led teams they feel valued, appreciated, part of a larger whole. Most people who have worked at multiple jobs know exactly what I am talking about. When players try to run the show and don't value  coach input that isn't a player led team, that is a circus which we surely are familiar with in our past.  
    • For our pics and trades tonight and tmrw.  Remember, Aho was a 2nd rounder and Slavin was a 4th rounder. 
    • Seems to be the consensus from the talking heads. I really wish we had double dipped at center in the 2nd round. Sion will never play in the league. 
×
×
  • Create New...