Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Serious non-biased question about Jake/Peppers/Gross...


Zaximus

Release Jake if it means we get to keep Gross/Peppers?  

34 members have voted

  1. 1. Release Jake if it means we get to keep Gross/Peppers?

    • Yes
      25
    • No
      9


Recommended Posts

If releasing Jake would allow us to keep Gross and Peppers, and maybe get a few key signings with role players (also maybe release Lucas) etc would you be for that and be OK with letting McCown and Moore battle for the role? Honestly, we just need a manager and some passes to Steve Smith, the run game with our o-line back should be good, that is if we get a defense back together that doesn't suck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I bet steve smith would punch you in the face :D

Ha, maybe, although after Saturday, I don't know for sure.

It's just a question though, if we can keep our O-line and Peppers, then work on the rest of our game, all we need is a manager, someone that doesn't make mistakes and can hit some passes when we need him too. We need to be like Arizona, play to our strengths. It all lands on the shoulders of the defense though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If releasing Jake would allow us to keep Gross and Peppers, and maybe get a few key signings with role players (also maybe release Lucas) etc would you be for that and be OK with letting McCown and Moore battle for the role? Honestly, we just need a manager and some passes to Steve Smith, the run game with our o-line back should be good, that is if we get a defense back together that doesn't suck.

Not sure if the phrase is correct but.

Do a small evil for a greater good.

I've grown to like jake since he came here. I'm "attached". But to keep our O-line in tact and Keep Pep. Then no contest. Release him. With our oline gel'd and or RB's at the top of their game any QB in our system will look good. I love Jakes fire and intensity but i'd rather have our oline and pep. I've played team sports in HS and College. I was in the army. As soon as you think the world is going to end cause you're loseing a great team leader someone is brought in our steps up from in-house.

I don't want Jake gone. I thought it took CLASS to step up and admit that he played like crap and should be blamed for the lose. Whether he deserves that or not is up for all of us to debate. I'd ask him to restructure his contract with performace bonus or something like that. If that didn't work out well the situation was specifically Jake or Gross/Pep then good-bye and good luck somewhere else jake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a no brainer. Hell yeah Id let Jake go if I could keep my starting LT and DE. At this point Jake only has 1 value to this team and thats getting the ball to Steve Smith. Outside of that everything else he does well is an "intangible" that most starting QBs on good teams have. "He's a leader", "he's fiery", "his teammates look to him" are common themes you hear when describing Jake. Fact is, Jake had 6 years to get it done, and this year had his best offensive unit of his career and still could not do it. Time for someone else to get a chance as our leader.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I liked him when he was at Michigan because I'm a Wolverine homer. After that... 
    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
×
×
  • Create New...