Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If we trade Smith then get rid


onsitecom

Recommended Posts

of the coach staff as well. In season. At least that gets a jump start on next season with a new coach. Tony Dungy would workout perfectly. He knows how to handle a top QB (let's hope he can make ours one too) and he knows the defensive side as well. Forget square jaw. Tony Dungy would fix some major problems with the offense and defense. He would also fit Big Cat model citizen mode.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Get a jump on next year with a very young QB. This year is lost so get something out of it with a new staff or at least a new coach. The only real problem I see is Big Cat not paying 2 coaches for one year.

The coaching staff is leaving anyway...what's your point?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks BB but I didn't think they were ripping me. :)

If they were I was too stupid to feel it :>)

Why are you guys neg-repping onsitecom? This is exactly why Zod's going to take all of our rep and pie-giving abilities away. :P

Seriously though, it's no way to welcome a new guy to the forum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He’s kind of overrated to be honest. Never really felt like a true #1 or elevated his play to become a guy the defense really has to worry about. 
    • I'm going to be real, the reason that vote ended up so lop-sided by the end was directly due to my programming. So there's nothing tongue in cheek about it. Also I left PFF after the Collinsworth acquisition (didn't want to move to Cincy) but have stayed involved in analytics via backdoor channels, but I can absolutely say that the experience was eye-opening, not because those guys are unquestionable football savants and that I became one by proxy, but because the amount of information that becomes available outside of what the typical fan has access to is revelatory and also really drives home how much context is still being missed even with all of that information. You don't discover that you know everything, you discover how much you still can't know no matter how hard you try, hence my point about the NFL not being able to figure out what makes a QB good. There's a lot of AI work going into that now and even that only seems to further confuse things vs. actually enlighten the problem. In the professional realm teams don't really talk about quarterbacks as A strictly being better than B, but how A can potentially perform better than B given a specific context of C. Of course those contexts may be wider for A than B, but there's also contexts where B can outshine A, even with lesser talent surrounding them. So what good teams strive to do is ultimately define a process of how they want their entire team to operate under schematically, find players that fit that scheme, and hopefully find a guy whose skillset will be maximized running that scheme with those players. Where bad teams fall of the wagon is constantly shifting those schemes and chasing bad fits or fads vs. sticking with a core identity and developing it.
    • there is a 100 mile long list of NFL players and coaches going to bat and defending horrible play from teammates.   
×
×
  • Create New...