Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

McNabb might be availble next year as FA


raleigh-panther

Recommended Posts

Things seem a little shaky in DC.

Not my favorite QB by any stretch, and yes I know he is West Coast; but, depending on who the new Coach is, he might be a good FA stop gap.

He may find Carolina a little more to his liking than DC as well.

I never felt he was too warm and fuzzy on the Redskins.

Stop. QB is not even close to being our main problem out there. It has not been all year, and it was proven once again today.

Put in Matt, Clausen, McNabb, Brady, the next top draft pick. Won't make a single difference with this O-line, with this attrocious running game, receiver corps, and mainly with this team playing this BAD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stop. QB is not even close to being our main problem out there. It has not been all year, and it was proven once again today.

this thread isn't really about this year, though. You're right, but next year, we're going to need to solve those issues, too.

next year we're going to want a veteran QB in some form, though I don't know McNabb is that guy, because I think it would help a lot to have someone on the sidelines with some experience, but I expect he'll go some place he can start right off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

exactly.

I disagree that QB isn't a problem. It is a problem and a Veteran is needed.

As for locking threads, come on guys, this is a forum. The news today is that things aren't quite so rosy in DC. How is this any different than than the 1000 threads on what coach we should have or what QB is preferred.

Regardless, lock away, my feelings won't be hurt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this thread isn't really about this year, though. You're right, but next year, we're going to need to solve those issues, too.

next year we're going to want a veteran QB in some form, though I don't know McNabb is that guy, because I think it would help a lot to have someone on the sidelines with some experience, but I expect he'll go some place he can start right off.

And both Matt or Clausen will be up for that job by next year. Matt's already proven he can be consisent with a GOOD team. Clausen should get better by then too.

The main problem is getting the TEAM to be good and that calls for a lot of other changes besides QB.

I know it's a lot easier to just throw the blame on Matt, and talk about how a replacement is going to fix everything. It won't. Not even close.

This forum has been so blinded with the QB debate, we no longer even want to take a GOOD LOOK at what the problem really is out there. Today, up until the 4th quarter the QB was NOT the problem. By the time Matt became a problem the game was done. He was actually one of the few guys that were playing a solid game out there. Do you guys even want to take a look at what REALLY happened?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's were we disagree.

I don't think Moore is going to be back.

His contract expires and I doubt very seriously that the new regime will bring him back.

Ok well if he won't be we'll still have Clausen. And if it turns out Clausen is still shaky, and we need a another vet we can talk about that then.

In the mean time most should still be talking about the O-line, receivers, team attitude(Steve Smith), and overall coaching and management.

If you don't start at the TOP, and fix the managment and coaching NONE of this discussion matters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Bryce Young has recorded 4 game-winning drives through nine weeks, leading the Carolina Panthers to crucial victories in tight contests. The 12-play, 58-yard clock-killer versus the Packers in Week 9 (16-13 upset). This pace positions him as the team's most clutch performer in years, with a 68.4% success rate on go-ahead drivesalready surpassing many franchise benchmarks early in his career.   Young's early 2025 surge (top-5 league-wide in clutch EPA at 0.28 per dropback) not only outstrips the debuts of Newton (2 in 2011) and Delhomme (1 in 2003) but hints at him climbing this list quickly if the Panthers sustain their wildcard hunt. Data underscores his growth: no other Panther QB hit 4 GWDs before Week 10 in a season.   The energy fans pour into the stadium directly shapes Bryce Young’s performance positive support has been shown to elevate his fourth-quarter efficiency by 12%, strengthening team cohesion and execution under pressure. Criticizing or booing the starting quarterback fractures morale, disrupts focus, and undermines the very resilience needed in clutch moments. When fans stand firmly behind their QB and team, they become a true home-field advantage, amplifying performance and accelerating the path to sustained success. Now are you a Carolina Panther fan or a Panther hater? 
    • Bryce would have extended some plays scrambling with his legs but then again he also has a high number of fumbles so you never know what you're going to get and the way the Bills were getting after Andy (sacked 7 times) it stands to reason Bryce would have been under duress often. What exactly do you want here? I mean I'm going to go by the gameplan I saw after Bryce turned the ball over against GB. Clearly Dave Canales was deliberately trying to limit the opportunities for him to make a catastrophic mistake. And didn't Micah Parsons log zero QB pressures? So with that in mind if you are asking for anyone to argue our offense with Bryce would have had much if any success against that opportunistic motivated Bills defense while we were also splitting carries between Rico and Chuba who had the majority of them which ended up being a situation resulting in a weeks worth of scathing criticism and deservedly so then I'm going to just have to say we can agree to disagree.
×
×
  • Create New...