Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rodney Stuckey Available?


Proudiddy

Recommended Posts

Should we go after him... I recall seeing a headline on RealGM last week stating that the Pistons weren't going to re-sign him. Now, I read a story on Hoopshype today that said the Pistons coach tried to call him over to the sidelines during a play stoppage twice and Stuckey never even looked at him. So the coach called him again, and still no response.

So, the Pistons coach benched him for the rest of the game, I think it was for the last 20 minutes of the game. They asked Stuckey about it afterwards and he said (you'll love this), "it is what it is."

I have a feeling these events combined with the emergence of Will Bynum last year and the Pistons 0-5 start, has to make Stuckey available through trade.

Livingston was a horrible signing so far, and I see no evidence of the guy that was starting to look like a player again last season. Maybe he's out of shape, but who knows, I don't feel like waiting.

I feel like we need two strong options at PG. DJ has played better, but then he has a fairly bad game, so consistency is an issue. If he's not having a good game, like last night, wouldn't it be nice to have a guy like Stuckey come in and pick up the slack on those bad nights? Stuckey can also play as an off guard. What do you guys think? Who would you trade for him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://content.usatoday.com/communities/gameon/post/2010/11/piston-rodney-stuckey-refuses-to-play/1

Things are going from bad to worse to downright ugly with the Detroit Pistons. One day after coach John Kuester called out the team for a lack of leadership it was Kuester who was twice ignored when he called for Rodney Stuckey to re-enter the game.

...

Tayshaun Prince pointed the finger right back at Kuester, saying: "He's right, but at the same time it goes both ways. We can sit here and continue to get on each other and be vocal, but like I said, the right thing has got to come from him as well as us."

Prince then added that, "Obviously, we're 0-4 so it ain't just the team."

Last night, Stuckey refused to go back into the game twice in the third quarter and sat out the last 21 minutes while finishing with five points and three assists in 13 minutes. Stuckey's only comment, according to the Detroit Free Press, was, "It is what it is."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stuckey would be a good pickup. Shoot, since Stuckey and Prince seem to be upset with the Pistons, it would be great if both of them came down to Charlotte.

Stuckey would bring a consistent 15 ppg, and with DJ, you never know what your going to get. You might get 18+ one night, and then a 5pt 3ast game from him another. He isnt consistent enough. Prince would also add some much needed consistency as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nothing wrong with starting to look for bodies early. It's a long injury filled season. I doubt we get through unscathed. 
    • We're in alignment regarding Thielen not being a game changer/breaker for the Panthers. Getting the ball into hands of playmakers like TMac and XL is going to open up things more than it is getting it to Thielen underneath (or letting him go after 50/50 balls 20yds downfield in his mid-30s). However, in a room where the other guys are two second year guys and two rookies, having a reliable vet that they can learn from is just as important as it is for the QB to have as a reliable third option. I can see that being worth $8.5M (just 3%) of the $279.2M cap... especially when looking at what's left out there: https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/free-agents/_/position/wr However, the idea that the team is forcing production to Thielen and leading to losses isn't supported by the data. Targets, not receiving yards, are how you can tell if a player is being "force fed." In the two games mentioned, let's look at the other players available... vs. TB 10 targets - Adam Thielen 9 targets - David Moore 8 targets - Tommy Tremble, Xavier Legette 3 targets - Jonathon Brooks 1 target - Dan Chisena, Feleipe Franks, Stephen Sullivan vs. PHI 11 targets - Adam Thielen 8 targets - Xavier Legette 5 targets - Chuba Hubbard, David Moore 2 targets - Tommy Tremble 1 target - Ja'Tavion Sanders, Deven Thompkins There isn't exactly a bounty of other names to throw the ball to. In those games, AT was one of the top 2 WRs. Diontae had been gone by that point.   So... yea. Agreed that Thielen isn't exactly carrying the team in his mid-30s, but it's undeniable that he was the most reliable target last season that still has quite a bit of value this season. Whether or not that value is reflected in a manner folks think on the contract is going to come down to personal taste. However, the idea that the team was forcing production to AT and that was the reason behind some losses couldn't be further from the truth.
    • I would also add that I think it's more than money.  AT has looked absolutely miserable out there at times, and there was a lot of speculation he would demand to be traded.  Personally, I thought he was a lock to be moved last year.  Maybe his hamstring is the only thing that prevents that from happening. The fact that he's not only willing to come back and play, but excited about it, really bodes well for Bryce.  AT is a veteran and he knows the game.  If he didn't have confidence in Bryce, I guarantee you he wouldn't be in a Panther uniform this year.  I'll take that as a positive.
×
×
  • Create New...