Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Call of Duty: Black Ops upsets Cuban government

The Saltman

By The Saltman,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

The Saltman Apprentice

The Saltman

Posted
Posted

Activision's game denounced as "doubly perverse" and "sociopathic" thanks to Castro-assassination mission.

As expressed in the state-run Web site Cubadebate, the Cuban government has taken major umbrage with the game, particularly its first level.

(SPOILER ALERT)

"U.S. launches video game whose objective is to assassinate Fidel" ran a headline on the Web site, referring to a mission that sees players attempt to assassinate a young Fidel Castro shortly after his forces overran Havana and deposed dictator Fulgencio Batista. Instead, players kill a body double and are captured.

:lol:

http://www.gamespot.com/news/6283873.html?tag=latestheadlines;title;4

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • PanthersATL
      Dan Morgan on Rich Eisen show

      By PanthersATL · Posted

      it helps that Bryce and Tmac worked out a bit this off-season before the draft and are familiar with each other's game from way back.  Sure Bryce put in a good word for him to the coaching crew ahead of time That california connection goin' work, I hope
    • NAS
      Jaire Alexander Released

      By NAS · Posted

      Sign but make it mostly incentive driven contract
    • Tr3ach
      Dan Morgan on Rich Eisen show

      By Tr3ach · Posted

      My biggest problem is I think the players he likes don't really work in the modern NFL.  You mentioned the wr room being a lot better, is it?  It has the potential to be.   Last year when we traded up to get Legette, they said they traded up to take him specifically because he was a true X receiver.   Now this year they take TMac because they say he is and that XL was out of posisition last year.  Im not sold on Tmac yet just like I wasn't sold on XL last year.  If TMac isn't a lot better than last XL was last season then that's back to back first rounders in one position that would still need a huge amount of work.  Hopefully Tmac is what everyone seems to think he will be, I'm just not so sure, but them declaring XL was a true X receiver after the draft last year and what they're saying now should at least give you pause about their receivers evaluation because it means they definitely made a mistake one way or another.
×
×
  • Create New...