Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFC South Pick Challenge (WEEK 16)


conrad77

Recommended Posts

Week 16 12/26/10

You need 40 games to games to qualify for seasonal champ. 4 games in any week for weekly champ

>>>>>>>>>IMPORTANT NOTE<<<<<<<<<

DON'T FORGET-YOU MUST PLAY EITHER WEEK 16 OR 17 TO ALSO QUALIFY FOR SEASONAL CHAMP.

For new players, please read Rules For New Players, BEFORE posting your picks.

All are welcomed!

Most of all, have fun and enjoy!

Rules/posting - Recent important changes:

Moderators will no longer be responsible for correcting poster's errors when not posting the correct names and in the correct sequence, that may cause the poster to not get proper credit for their selections.

If you enter zero or leave the tiebreaker number blank, you cannot qualify for Weekly Champ.

Spreads are as of 2PM 12/20/10

This weeks games are:

Seahawks +6.5 @ Bucs

Giants +2.5 @ Packers

Jets +1.5 @ Bears

Falcons @ Saints +2.5

Tiebreaker: Gross passing yards - Saints

Good luck!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It wasn't a his sack production, it was about his skill set, build, and scheme fit. He's a six foot tall 280 pound DT. He's best used as an interior pass rushing specialist. He can't play the nose in a 3-4 and he doesn't have the length or burst to play he end either. He just wasn't a scheme fit. He'd be a good roster piece as a rotational pass rushing specialist DT to bring in on passing downs in an even defensive front. But you can't hand out a 3 year/$45M contract for that either. Tha type of contract means you have to try to find starter snap numbers for him and that's a problem in a 3-4 front. Hell, it's a problem in a 4-3 front too. That's why the Chiefs were willing to let him walk.
    • Quite a few people argued we way overpaid high end starter money for a guy that was basically a capable backup at best. It was a bad move facilitated by a need to save face after missing out on Williams. It is what it is man. We aren't being paid to carry Dan Morgan's water. It'll be alright.
    • Who else at DT was available coming off a 6.5 sack season, that was relatively affordable?  We took the Milton Williams money and added Turk AND Bobby Brown III. You can't predict soft tissue, and surgery in this case. Part of the business.  
×
×
  • Create New...