Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

This Year's Rookie Receivers


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

Just something I thought worthy of discussion after a little research today.

(I have a vague feeling someone may have brought this up before, but I can't find it; if it's a repost, I apologize)

In the 2010 Draft, five receivers were selected before Brandon LaFell, several others prior to David Gettis.

Here are the stats for the top five receivers taken on the year (from NFL.com)

Demariyus Thomas (1st Rd, 22nd Overall, Broncos) 10 games, 2 starts, 22 catches, 283 yards, (12.9 avg), 31 YPG, 2 TDs, 3 fumbles

Dez Bryant (1st Rd, 24th Overall, Cowboys) 12 games, 2 starts, 45 catches, 561 yards, (12.5 avg), 46 YPG, 6 TDs, 1 fumble

Arrelious Benn (2nd Rd, 39th Overall, Bucs) 15 games, 9 starts, 25 catches, 395 yards, (15.8 avg), 64 YPG, 2 TDs, 1 fumble

Golden Tate (2nd Rd, 60th Overall, Seahawks) 11 games, 0 starts, 21 catches, 227 yards, (10.8 avg), 52 YPG, 0 TDs, 1 fumbles

Damian Williams (3rd Rd, 77th Overall, Titans) 16 games, 1 starts, 16 catches, 219 yards, (13.7 avg), 39 YPG, 0 TDs, 0 fumbles

Naturally, several more receivers were taken before Gettis came up in round six.

Here are the numbers for LaFell and Gettis:

Brandon LaFell (3rd Rd, 78th Overall, Panthers) 14 games, 2 starts, 38 catches, 468 yards, (12.3 avg), 33.4 YPG, 1 TDs, 0 fumbles

David Gettis (6th Rd, 198th Overall, Panthers) 15 games, 13 starts, 37 catches, 508 yards, (13.7 avg), 33.9 YPG, 3 TDs, 0 fumbles

Yes, situations are different, but the number of games and starts are fairly comparable down the line.

Of the first five taken, only Dez Bryant can rightly be said to have outperformed Gettis and LaFell. Do they have the best numbers of all rookies? No. Mike Williams took the rookie title. Jordan Shipley - taken six spots behing LaFell by the Bengals - was also better (both Williams and Shipley outdid Dez Bryant). Blair White was close.

Still, fourth and fifth best rookie years for a 3rd and 6th round pick?

Not too bad :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think numbers are very misleading.... To me the question is if those other wr's were on the panthers would their stats be any different from gettis and Brandon... For me the answer is no.

I think someone had to catch the ball, and when you have games with all rookie Wr's they are gonna get yards.

Shipley might of had more yards than Dez, but in no way did he outplay him this year. Dez can did what shipley did, but shipley could not do what dez did in Dallas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think numbers are very misleading.... To me the question is if those other wr's were on the panthers would their stats be any different from gettis and Brandon... For me the answer is no.

I think someone had to catch the ball, and when you have games with all rookie Wr's they are gonna get yards.

Shipley might of had more yards than Dez, but in no way did he outplay him this year. Dez can did what shipley did, but shipley could not do what dez did in Dallas.

Pretty much all of them were actually in better offenses with more established quarterbacks throwing to them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty much all of them were actually in better offenses with more established quarterbacks throwing to them.

But they were not the only option or #1 reads on their teams.... that's the difference. When your rookie Wr's are your #1 and #2 reads and not your #3 and #4 reads they are gonna see more passes com that way.

The only way for me to objectively look at the situation is what do I think our Wr's would have done in other situations, and what would those other Wr's have done in Carolina's situation!

For me my answer is that they would not have put up those numbers on other teams, and the Wr's for the other teams would have had similar yards in Carolina.... The only other alternative would have been Carolina passing for 50 or less yards a game.... The passes/yards have to go to someone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But they were not the only option or #1 reads on their teams.... that's the difference. When your rookie Wr's are your #1 and #2 reads and not your #3 and #4 reads they are gonna see more passes com that way.

The only way for me to objectively look at the situation is what do I think our Wr's would have done in other situations, and what would those other Wr's have done in Carolina's situation!

For me my answer is that they would not have put up those numbers on other teams, and the Wr's for the other teams would have had similar yards in Carolina.... The only other alternative would have been Carolina passing for 50 or less yards a game.... The passes/yards have to go to someone.

Gettis had more starts than everyone but Benn, but not LaFell. He only started two games.

Add in that our top read is Steve Smith most of the time when he's healthy.

I'm not saying they're the best receivers in football, but I do believe they've shown as much potential as anyone. And that...makes me happy :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gettis had more starts than everyone but Benn, but not LaFell. He only started two games.

Add in that our top read is Steve Smith most of the time when he's healthy.

I'm not saying they're the best receivers in football, but I do believe they've shown as much potential as anyone. And that...makes me happy :)

So you do not believe those players could have done the same thing had they been in Carolina?

Steve Smith.... injured off and on

No real #3, and #4 WR

No True TE threat on the team....

Playing Wr on a team with not many options to catch the ball. Like I said I honestly believe those players would have produced the same numbers here in Carolina!!!

That is the only way for me to objectively evaluate them.... If you don't think those other players would have put up similar stats HERE in Carolina... then that's just your opinion and I will respectfully disagree with that 100%

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you do not believe those players could have done the same thing had they been in Carolina?

Steve Smith.... injured off and on

No real #3, and #4 WR

No True TE threat on the team....

Playing Wr on a team with not many options to catch the ball. Like I said I honestly believe those players would have produced the same numbers here in Carolina!!!

That is the only way for me to objectively evaluate them.... If you don't think those other players would have put up similar stats HERE in Carolina... then that's just your opinion and I will respectfully disagree with that 100%

You're talking about something that's impossible to project, though.

You could throw in any number of "what ifs" (injuries, schemes, opponents, whatever).

In the end, there's no way to say for certain whether someone else might have done better here or not.

What we can look at is where they all actually performed where they were, and for those results for this season, I'm pretty pleased.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What about attempts though, how many times these guys were thrown too? Seems easy to just post stats but not the whole picture. Man I really hate stats they really don't tell you anything. Overall, the only reason we did OK is they were drafted later rounds the fact is no rookie WR was anything special this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TBH, these are the kind of players that get weeded out of professional sports pretty quickly. Also, CMC is not that guy. There is zero indication that he isn't competitive. 
    • I like the free agency. It actually helps basically all schools across the board. Pretty much only ancient HC's and/or HC's that haven't been able to adjust have been complaining about the free agency. Your fortunes can be made or broken every offseason. It's not like before where a bad recruiting class or two meant multiyear purgatory.  I will never understand all the bellyaching about the NIL. If you want to talk about what ruined college athletics, it has been naked greed. Conference expansions for TV revenue, ever skyrocketing AD and facilities costs and now the attempts to permanently ruin the postseasons(football and basketball).  All the kids did was get a very well deserved piece of a very, very, VERY broken pie.
    • Nobody is saying they don't count against the cap, because yes, they technically do count against the cap as it's money the team is paying and it needs to be accounted for. But what you're not grasping it seems is that if a player gets $10 million guaranteed in their contract, whether they get literally $0 as a signing bonus or $8 million as a signing bonus, it doesn't change the overall cap hit of the contract, because cap hits are about the guaranteed money, not how much is paid up front. The only thing that how much is paid up front changes, is how the cap hit can be spread out amongst the years. So yes, technically there could end up being a slightly bigger cap hit in year 3 and 4 due to a bigger signing bonus, but if that is the case, it also means there will be a lesser cap hit in years 1 and 2 than there would have been with a smaller bonus.  But over the length of the contract, the size of the signing bonus has literally zero affect on the overall cap hit of the contract, because THAT part of it is 100% about the guaranteed money and nothing else.
×
×
  • Create New...