Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Was Rivera our 1st choice?


riddel

Recommended Posts

Now that's just silly.

I'm only suggesting Rivera was not the top name on the list and that the Panthers may have settled. It's a fair suggestion considering the report that has been blasted all over ESPN as a fact. If a deal was on the table and refused, then that sounds like an important little tid bit of information.

I would hate for Richardson to be hiring whatever he can find available, rather than actually assembling a quality coaching staff that meshes together. I'm already concerned that Rivera doesn't have enough control or even input into the coaching staff selection process.

Yes men bother me. I pray that Rivera is not Richardson's yes man.

Think you are wrong on Rivera not being the first choice. He fits the Panthers MO for a head coach. Is he a yes man to a point yes. But if you dont think he had a hand in hiring the assistants and coordinators then you are wrong. He will have his say but Hurney will have his too. Dont take every interview for face value. Behind the scenes he has some control but no coach the Panthers would have hired would have total or demanding control.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ESPN pulls stuff out of their asses all the time and reports it as fact. you took that report and said that they had a deal on the table.

you're reading far too much into something that has no weight other than schefter reported it. schefter didn't even say anything about a deal being on the table, did he? he pulled something out of his ass and you are taking that turd and adding to it something that you pulled out of your ass.

we didn't settle. we got the best guy for the job. we got the guy we wanted. we got our first choice.

and richardson is not a yes man.

quit being paranoid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You really think we wanted some OC over a highly touted DC?

First off, I think like most businesses, the Panther's weighed the options and put feelers out while Fox was coaching out his lame duck season. I believe the Panther's knew because of this research which coaches would be interested in the job and they compiled a list of those coaches. I do not believe that Rivera was the only guy we were interested in and simply went through the motions.

Secondly, if the report is true, then yes the Panther's wanted some OC over a highly touted DC. Offer on the table and refused is what the report said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

he's not even an OC! he's a frikkin Oline coach.

no interview was done. no offer was made. they might have inquired at some point, but rivera was their man.

Yeah...I copied and pasted the OC comment from another poster.....he's the OL and may become the Titans new HC......

I'm glad you guys are so confident in the Panthers management process.....sorry for asking the question. We can move on now before Rayzor has a hissy fit....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cant believe Munchak was the first option. Wrong side of the ball for the Panthers.

I could see maybe wanting to bring him in for an interview. I'm guessing that Munchak was turning things down cause he felt 2011 was going to be a lame duck year for Fisher, and he'd have as good a shot as any to get the job once Fisher was gone, which got accelerated by a few months.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah...I copied and pasted the OC comment from another poster.....he's the OL and may become the Titans new HC......

I'm glad you guys are so confident in the Panthers management process.....sorry for asking the question. We can move on now before Rayzor has a hissy fit....

you jumped in there and said he had an offer on the table when he wasn't even interviewed. he may have been someone that the panthers inquired about, but they went after their top guy.

no hissy fits. just dealing with someone who is a bit paranoid after listening to espn and believing that they actually have insight into something that the panthers did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everyone reported Cowher for the last 3 years, so you can't pin that one on one reporter.

But he made it a point to report it consistently, both he and Mort.

Their word is about as worthwhile as most of the posts on the Huddle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you jumped in there and said he had an offer on the table.

nope.

it was reported this way....

"turned down three offers this year to take position with other teams which included the Carolina Panthers head coaching job"

offer

Definitions (2)1. The lowest price that any investor or dealer has declared that he/she will sell a given security or commodity for. For over-the-counter stocks, the offer is the best quoted price at which a Market Maker is willing to sell a stock. For mutual funds, the offer is the net asset value plus any sales charges. also called asked price or asking price or offering price or ask.

2. To express a desire to enter into an arrangement or contract with another party.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the history of hiring coaches how many teams have really ever gotten their first choice?

Washington Redskins.

Not always the smart choice, but almost always the first choice. Boils down to, are you willing to pay, but paying doesn't equal championships.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That should have been this year. Tough to sell to anyone worth getting when this crew is going into year 3 on the hot seat. I still think keeping Evero will sink them all after last year's showing. If/when he is scapegoated they need to show improvement or it's likely to be so eone else's problem next year. I do agree in principle tho, it all should have happened after last year's problems. 
    • I've listened to some things that have calmed the "Bryce was flat out terrible" to just "he was really bad" in Week 1. It's Year 3 though, and that shouldn't be the barometer. I've got 1% hope left for Bryce, and that's just blind homerism coming out.  I'm scared that as much emphasis as the team places on advanced stats and PFF that the team *doesn't* think Bryce was that bad in Week 1. Couple that with so many of the QBs in the league looking rough, offense being down in general, and I feel like there's a lot of "what if's" going on in the building instead of facing the music.  Lose Week 2, and we should switch the main focus back to building/churning the roster, evaluating young guys, and hoping our next QB can have a Jayden Daniels level of impact. As we're all well too aware of, QB is a crapshoot a lot of the time. Admit we made a bad pick, and go draft another. And another. Repeat until correct.     
    • I wouldn't want any of those starting as a rookie on day 1.  That said, we need a vet, that is not Andy Dalton, that can be the starter while a prospect grows and learns on the sidelines.
×
×
  • Create New...