Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL Files with NLRB


mav1234

Recommended Posts

...The NFL is filing with the NLRB, against the NFLPA. Crazy, since some people on this board thought the NFLPA would. Wonder if we haven't been getting the whole story? ;)

NFL spokesman Greg Aiello has confirmed that the league has filed with National Labor Relations Board a charge of unfair labor practices. The league claims that the NFLPA has failed to bargain in good faith as a result of a strategy to decertify and file antitrust litigation against the league.

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/14/league-files-unfair-labor-practice-charge-over-plan-to-decertify/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yea sure mav. he defiantly hasnt built an empire from the ground up and brought together tens of thousands of people to get a team in Charlotte and run the team as well. I mean, the players have done so much, not having to ever go to class from the age of 16 to 21 and make millions of dollars on good faith.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, perhaps the NLRB will find that the tyrant Jerry Richardson is unfairly treating his workers and the NFL in general. :P

The owners are going to see the same type of suit filed against them by the players, but the players actually have boulwarism and surface bargaining complaints. It was only a matter of time before the NLRB got involved.

This is going to get very interesting.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The owners are going to see the same type of suit filed against them by the players, but the players actually have boulwarism and surface bargaining complaints. It was only a matter of time before the NLRB got involved.

This is going to get very interesting.....

They do not have those complaints yet and your belief they do is based off of the one side of the argument you are hearing. The NFL has made it clear they won't give their side in public because they don't want to negotiate through the media. The NFLPA knows they need to gain ground fast. Fans are a way to do that. Hence the public approach.

Does anyone know why the NFLPA might not want to call it's proposal a proposal at the last meeting, and instead, an illustration? That is what caused the breakdown, at least according to one source.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The owners are going to see the same type of suit filed against them by the players, but the players actually have boulwarism and surface bargaining complaints. It was only a matter of time before the NLRB got involved.

This is going to get very interesting.....

You are correct that it would be easy for the NFL to get slapped with boulwarism...but the players have actually been more blanent about it and really the actions of having each team vote to decertify was the equivilent of holding up a big sign that reads "We are going to use this to force the leagues hands in court and we have no plans of true and honest negociating." How do you not see that as an act of boulwarism?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are correct that it would be easy for the NFL to get slapped with boulwarism...but the players have actually been more blanent about it and really the actions of having each team vote to decertify was the equivilent of holding up a big sign that reads "We are going to use this to force the leagues hands in court and we have no plans of true and honest negociating." How do you not see that as an act of boulwarism?

For one, boulwarism is a bargaining technique that the company uses and employees can not force a CBA through. The employees only option if a CBA is forced through is to strike.

As I've been saying for weeks, the owners are not making concessions and that constitutes surface bargaining, because the owners are merely going through the motions with out "reasonable" intent to setting employment terms. The owners are the ones threatening lockout and using it to pressure the players into an unacceptable CBA.

Mark my words. The NFL will face surface bargaining and boulwarism charges, once the players union reps get their heads out of their arses....the case is very clear. Richardson's speech to the owners in March 2010 will be used against the owners. You can't tell the union that you are not going to bend and that you are going to lock them out if they do not agree to your terms.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone know why the NFLPA might not want to call it's proposal a proposal at the last meeting, and instead, an illustration? That is what caused the breakdown, at least according to one source.

The CBA proposal is the owners' responsibility to present. The players union will simply redline the proposal and negotiate the terms. The union will not be presenting a CBA to the owners, its the other way around.

From what I'm seeing the players have poor representation and the owners are trying to take advantage of that. If the players union had proper representation, then they would have filed the NLRB suit against the owners once they walked out of the negotiations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We also do not know for certain that the NFL has refused any compromise. They are not issuing their stances publicly, so the only way we will know if that is the case is if the "last, best offer" is identical to the first offer... because the NFLPA is certainly not going to come out and say, "Oh yeah, the owners had concessions but we didn't like 'em"...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Didn't the NFLPA also say back in December that the internal deadline for a new CBA had passed and to prepare for a lockout?

The NFLPA has no control over a lockout. The NFL owners are the only ones that control that. The NFLPA can strike if they do not agree to the final terms of the new CBA, but there is no new CBA, so that's not an option yet either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While the NFLPA may have poor representation, the fact they haven't turned towards litigation yet either means that Smith doesn't think he can win right now OR the players don't want it. Don't think for a second this guy is afraid to take that option. Just because you think he's taking the wrong approach does not mean he is poorly representing his clients.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't care about that this team has been an almost "ran" for like 8 years now, they had more cap space a surplus of assets, and did nothing to fix this teams fatal flaws. This season ends it five games or less to tampa..... bookmark it.
    • from joe person       In round two, we had Morgan making a trade with Seattle Seahawks GM John Schneider, Morgan’s former boss in Seattle. The Panthers moved back from 51 to 56 (which Seattle had traded up for), while getting the Seahawks’ third-round pick (96) and giving up one of their fifths (158). The deal left Carolina with four selections in the top 100. Round 1, No. 19 Monroe Freeling, OT, Georgia Something about mock season always leads us back to the SEC. After taking Miami edge rusher Akheem Mesidor in this spot last month, we brushed up on our math and figured out that, while talented, Mesidor will be pushing 30 when it’s time for his second contract. That doesn’t seem like a Morgan move, despite having also starred at The U. Freeling, who turns 22 the first week of training camp, was viewed initially by some teams as a late-first-round prospect. But his stock has risen as scouts have gotten more of a look at the 6-7, 315-pounder with 33¾-inch arms. Freeling showed off his athleticism in Indianapolis, running a 40 in 4.93 seconds with a 1.72-second, 10-yard split. Freeling started only one full season at Georgia and is still developing. The Panthers could also sign a veteran such as Yosh Nijman to replace injured Ikem Ekwonu and help Freeling get ready to take over. The question is whether Freeling will be available at 19. The Athletic’s Dane Brugler has him going to the Miami Dolphins at 11 in his two-round mock that dropped Wednesday. But at least one NFC talent personnel executive thinks Freeling could fall to the Panthers. In round two, we had Morgan making a trade with Seattle Seahawks GM John Schneider, Morgan’s former boss in Seattle. The Panthers moved back from 51 to 56 (which Seattle had traded up for), while getting the Seahawks’ third-round pick (96) and giving up one of their fifths (158). The deal left Carolina with four selections in the top 100.   Round 2, No. 56 (from SEA) Jacob Rodriguez, LB, Texas Tech As mentioned above, don’t be surprised if the Panthers open their wallets next week for Devin Lloyd, Kaden Elliss or one of the other top free-agent linebackers. It’s a position that needs to be addressed with a big swing, if not more. And the second round feels like the sweet spot for playmaking, off-ball linebackers. In our initial mock, we went with Texas linebacker Anthony Hill Jr., a 6-3, 238-pounder with big upside as a blitzer. But while Hill’s coverage skills are still a work in progress, Rodriguez will arrive in the NFL as a three-down ‘backer who had four interceptions last year for the Red Raiders. The 6-1, 231-pound Rodriguez finished his career with 19 forced turnovers, so he knows how to be disruptive around the ball. Brugler, who also has Rodriguez going to Carolina in the second round, noted that Texas Tech coaches called him the “quarterback of the defense.” That sounds like a former Panthers linebacker who will be receiving a gold jacket this summer.     Round 3, No. 83 Jake Slaughter, C, Florida The Panthers haven’t taken an offensive lineman in two drafts with Morgan as GM. But he could draft two this year, depending on how Cade Mays’ free agency plays out and what the Panthers’ plan is to replace Mays if he signs elsewhere. Along with Auburn’s Connor Lew, Slaughter is considered one of the top centers in the draft. And the 6-5, 303-pounder appears poised to be a plug-and-play guy from Day 1, having started more than 30 games over five seasons in Gainesville. Slaughter is 83rd in Brugler’s rankings, so this was really the perfect spot for him. Slaughter graduated last spring with a degree in agricultural education and communication and was on the SEC’s academic honor roll his final four seasons. Just as importantly, Slaughter is said to have a high football IQ, critical at the center position.   Round 3, No. 96 (from SEA) Keyron Crawford, edge, Auburn This could be one of those classic cases of a team (or mock drafter) scouting one player from a Power 4 team and developing a draft crush on one of his teammates. Auburn defensive end Keldric Faulk has been mocked to the Panthers by a couple of draft analysts, and it’s not hard to see why. The 6-6, 276-pound Faulk has impressive length and a high ceiling. But Crawford had more production than Faulk last season, finishing with more tackles, sacks, tackles for loss and passes defended than his more publicized teammate. Not bad for someone who didn’t start playing football until his senior year at his Memphis high school. True, the 6-4, 253-pound Crawford is a bit undersized. But his explosive first step, effort at all three levels and upside make him an excellent value pick late on the second day of the draft.   Round 4, No. 119 Chris McClellan, DT, Missouri The Panthers’ defense was improved last season, thanks in part to the return of defensive tackle Derrick Brown, a Pro Bowler in 2023. Brown finished with a career-high five sacks, tying Nic Scourton for the team lead. Still, the Panthers could use a pass-rushing interior lineman, especially with the team expected to trade or release A’Shawn Robinson in a cost-cutting move. Enter McClellan, the Florida transfer whose six sacks last season were more than his total from the previous three seasons combined. The 6-4, 313-pound McClellan looks the part with his 34-inch arms and 11-inch hands, among the largest of any player in the draft. Brugler believes McClelland has the strength to handle the point of attack and push the pocket as a rusher, calling him “an underrated player who will be part of a rotation for a long time.”   Round 5, No. 162 Kendrick Law, WR, Kentucky Before digging in on Law, it’s worth mentioning that the Panthers drafting a receiver in the first round for the third year in a row isn’t out of the question, depending on how their board shakes out. Is it likely? Probably not, but worth keeping in mind.     The Panthers would like to diversify their receiving room with a speedy, shifty athlete who can make plays after the catch and in the run game. They took a flyer on one in the sixth round last year in former Colorado wideout Jimmy Horn, who had a couple of splash plays as a rookie. Maybe Morgan and Dave Canales try it again with another Day-3 receiver. If so, the 5-11, 203-pound Law is worth a look. He transferred to Kentucky in 2025 after three years at Alabama and led the Wildcats in receptions (53) and receiving yards (540), a good chunk of which came on yards after the catch on bubble screens and other quick-hitting throws. Law doesn’t have blinding speed (he ran a 4.45-second 40 in Indy), but he has good hands and can break tackles in space. Plus, he returned kicks at Alabama and Kentucky, averaging 23 yards over the past three seasons. Round 6, No. 200 T.J. Hall, cornerback, Iowa With Mike Jackson in the final year of his contract and nearing his 30s, it’s not too early to start thinking about a succession plan. Teams typically don’t find starting corners late in the third day. And even those who do develop often take time. Jackson, a fifth-round pick in 2019, didn’t become a starter until 2022 in Seattle, his fourth team in three years. All of which to say that realistic expectations are needed for anyone who would have appeared in this space, including Hall, who at least has the size (6-1, 189) the Panthers look for in their corners. Hall only had two interceptions for the Hawkeyes and isn’t a burner. But he led Iowa with 10 pass breakups last season and was a willing tackler, with a team-high eight tackles in their bowl win over Vanderbilt.        
    • At the end of the season. Before the playoffs.
×
×
  • Create New...