Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

About to buy a PS3, recommend me some games!


Swarly

Recommended Posts

My xbox just broke... AGAIN, and my warranty expired. Tired of it breaking every few months so I'm switching to the PS3.

I figure I'll get the basics in CoD, NBA 2k11, Madden, but I know that PS3 has a lot of sick exclusive games that I haven't heard of. Any recommendations would be appreciated.

Also, does anyone have a PS3 Move? I think I'm going to get this too and was wondering if it's accurate or if it's really laggy?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've owned one in the past and it seemed more stable overall than the Xbox, albeit I had one of the old 40 Gig models. There is apparently some kind of hacking thing going on, might want to Google and look into that.

Both Uncharted games are must owns, God of War 3 is great if you like those. Metal Gear Solid 4 was awesome, the plot is ridiculous at times though. Little Big Planet is good, haven't tried the second one. Also suggest you look into Demons Souls.

Have not tried the Move so I'll leave that to someone else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ive had both the xbox 360 and the ps3. i think that you will be happy with the ps. not only is it 100 times less likeley to blow up on you, but it is also a more powerful machine. i accually wish that xbox would go out of business, because i am tired of gaming companies dumbing down the games for ps3 so that they can make them for the xbox too.

its hard to recommend games for you without knowing which genre you are into. check out one of the gaming sites like IGN.com to see how the games are rated. they have a rating for every game out there for every platform, and the ratings are pretty accurate 95% of the time.

just go to the site, and sort out the games based on rating, and you will get an idea of the best games for the platform.

Then why do they almost always make the Xbox version first? Multiplatform games are never as good as exclusives. Mario/Halo/LBP are unique to their own systems.

You realize how much the Xbox has pushed console gaming, right? Funny the PS2 didn't have a HDD, HD capabilities or a network adapter until the original Xbox was released.

The opposite is true of this generation, but Sony took a very stupid risk by depending on unproven technology in the PS3. I'm glad it paid off for them, but I bet they won't do it again anytime soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then why do they almost always make the Xbox version first? Multiplatform games are never as good as exclusives. Mario/Halo/LBP are unique to their own systems.

Microsoft $$$$$

Activision is a microsoft nut hugger. That's why Black Opps is a port from the Xbox version as well as why xbox got the new maps a month before ps3. Finally microsoft would love to push everyone away from ps3 and into a xbox.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

thanks for the recommendations folks

and yeah, as for the baseball question, one of the biggest reasons I'm getting a PS3 is because everyone I've spoken to has said MLB the show is probably one of the best sports games out there. I'd LOVE to get MLB10 but since MLB11 is right around the corner I guess I'll have to wait lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...