Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What do the players hope to win in court?


Highlandfire

Recommended Posts

Ok they decertify tonight, nothing happens till the owners decide to try and have free agency etc. At which time they will file an anti trust/ collusion suit.

Ok some folks on another board says the courts will fast track the lawsuits. I say bull poo. Any lawyer worth his salt can drag these out for a year.

But lets say the courts rule collusion then what? Nothing. Ok you win. I guess the guys under contract can play but those as free agents can't. By winning collusion you block free agency essentially screwing your fellow players in the NFL. BTW those that are franchise players, well they can't sign contracts either since there is no CBA so...

Those who are hoping franchise tags are dropped so they can become free agents, well how can you with teams not having the ability to?

As for as the courts, they can't force the NFL to pay anyone a certain amount so that is moot.

Bottom line they need to cut the bull poo, and sit down and negotiate out how big a pay cut they are going to take (and they are going to take one) and get it over with

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are right. D Smith has political aspirations and that is all there is to it. He never wanted to negotiate, he wants to crush the NFL and make a name for himself. All he is doing is hurting the players. I feel the NFL can hands down prove the NFLPA esp. Smith never tried to negotiate in good faith.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are right. D Smith has political aspirations and that is all there is to it. He never wanted to negotiate, he wants to crush the NFL and make a name for himself. All he is doing is hurting the players. I feel the NFL can hands down prove the NFLPA esp. Smith never tried to negotiate in good faith.

Totally agree.

Unfortunately, I fear the courts are Smith's battleground. He's an established Federal lawyer, with ties to some really powerful people. I believe the NFL could produce a video of him saying directly that he'll never agree to a contract, but it would get thrown out on a technicality or even just simply ignored.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Totally agree.

Unfortunately, I fear the courts are Smith's battleground. He's an established Federal lawyer, with ties to some really powerful people. I believe the NFL could produce a video of him saying directly that he'll never agree to a contract, but it would get thrown out on a technicality or even just simply ignored.

Dude. Richardson announced to on March 2010 to all the NFL owners, that they were going to take back the NFL from the players and lock them out if they would not agree to the owners terms. The NFL worked for two years to secure a TV contract war chest of $4 billion dollars and they held back $300 million in a savings pool by not offering full medical benefits.

Who exactly is guilty of collusion here and bad faith bargaining?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What they hope to gain is for the Judge to rule against the TV war chest which strips away the money the owners would receive. The players have won the monopoly argument before and the whole antitrust issue would be in play. What the players want is for the judge to pressure the sides to work something out rather than tie it up in court for a year or two which he will threaten. Last time it went to the courts, the players won free agency and pensions. Dody will be fair to all which frankly means the players will come out on the winning side. The owners will do better to keep this out of court and they know it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dude. Richardson announced to on March 2010 to all the NFL owners, that they were going to take back the NFL from the players and lock them out if they would not agree to the owners terms. The NFL worked for two years to secure a TV contract war chest of $4 billion dollars and they held back $300 million in a savings pool by not offering full medical benefits.

Who exactly is guilty of collusion here and bad faith bargaining?

How is it collusion exactly, for stakeholders in a league, to determine they want to run a more profitable business?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collusion

Collusion is an agreement between two or more persons, sometimes illegal and therefore secretive, to limit open competition by deceiving, misleading, or defrauding others of their legal rights, or to obtain an objective forbidden by law typically by defrauding or gaining an unfair advantage.

There's nothing "illegal" about anything Richardson has said. Stupid sounding maybe, but not illegal. And if it were "secretive" then you damn sure wouldn't have his words to quote.

It would be like saying "OMG, the Board of Directors for a major company are colluding to reduce the pay of their employees because they are making a very low profit!"

And as far as bad faith bargaining goes, Smith and NFLPA didn't even come to the table until a couple weeks ago. They had YEARS to start formal negotiations. Instead, we got tweets and reporter interviews stating that the NFLPA was going to sue. Which they did. Which is bad-faith bargaining on their part.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What they hope to gain is for the Judge to rule against the TV war chest which strips away the money the owners would receive. The players have won the monopoly argument before and the whole antitrust issue would be in play. What the players want is for the judge to pressure the sides to work something out rather than tie it up in court for a year or two which he will threaten. Last time it went to the courts, the players won free agency and pensions. Dody will be fair to all which frankly means the players will come out on the winning side. The owners will do better to keep this out of court and they know it.

So they want to destroy a major source of income for the owners of the teams? Never mind that could cripple the league? Nevermind that could force some of the less profitable clubs into bankruptcy?

The circumstances of the monopoly argument were different before. There was no existing CBA. There was no legal option out of it for the owners to decide on.

The owners aren't going to be bullied here. Worst case scenario... the NFL as a whole may close shop and re-open as a new league, with predetermined rules on player compensation to give the players the middle finger and establish what they will pay and won't pay.

How would you like that? No more NFL. No more "Super Bowl". No more AFC/NFC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So they want to destroy a major source of income for the owners of the teams? Never mind that could cripple the league? Nevermind that could force some of the less profitable clubs into bankruptcy?

The circumstances of the monopoly argument were different before. There was no existing CBA. There was no legal option out of it for the owners to decide on.

The owners aren't going to be bullied here. Worst case scenario... the NFL as a whole may close shop and re-open as a new league, with predetermined rules on player compensation to give the players the middle finger and establish what they will pay and won't pay.

How would you like that? No more NFL. No more "Super Bowl". No more AFC/NFC.

No you are missing the point. The owners get paid by the broadcaster if there is a season or not. The players are trying to get some of that. So the collusion is between the league and the networks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No you are missing the point. The owners get paid by the broadcaster if there is a season or not. The players are trying to get some of that. So the collusion is between the league and the networks.

That wasn't clear in his post.

Judge to rule against the TV war chest which strips away the money the owners would receive.

This sounded like an attempt to block the funds to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How is it collusion exactly, for stakeholders in a league, to determine they want to run a more profitable business?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collusion.

In a decision that could surpass the collusion rulings against Major League Baseball in terms of its importance to professional sports, and have a significant impact on the NFL’s ongoing labor dispute, U.S. District Judge David Doty has ruled in favor of football’s player’s union, the NFLPA, regarding claims that the league negotiated television contract extensions that were designed as “lockout insurance” as opposed to growing total revenues – revenues that determine the salary cap for the league (read the entire filing by the NFLPA).

http://blogs.forbes.com/sportsmoney/...l-labor-talks/

There are literally hundreds of pages with articles that detail the collusion charges....but.....I really didn't think linking you to them all was necessary...although if you quote wiki again, I may just quote every collusion article on the internet that shows the owners committed this act against the players union.

UGH!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a decision that could surpass the collusion rulings against Major League Baseball in terms of its importance to professional sports, and have a significant impact on the NFL’s ongoing labor dispute, U.S. District Judge David Doty has ruled in favor of football’s player’s union, the NFLPA, regarding claims that the league negotiated television contract extensions that were designed as “lockout insurance” as opposed to growing total revenues – revenues that determine the salary cap for the league (read the entire filing by the NFLPA).

http://blogs.forbes.com/sportsmoney/...l-labor-talks/

There are literally hundreds of pages with articles that detail the collusion charges....but.....I really didn't think linking you to them all was necessary...although if you quote wiki again, I may just quote every collusion article on the internet that shows the owners committed this act against the players union.

UGH!

I'm not really interested in a legal debate. Suffice to say, if the owners know the NFLPA is hostile, and not willing to negotiate in good faith, I don't see how it's a problem that they are preparing to modify their contracts in the event of a lockout/strike. That's just good business sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Looking Back at the 2021 Panthers Draft Class An NFL player's career on average is said to last just slightly over three years, and because of that, it's considered a general rule of thumb that by Year 3, a team knows what kind of professional football player a pick has developed into. While there are always exceptions to the rule, that's not the point of this topic. This is about the players who are still on the team after being picked up in the 2021 draft (or as UDFAs). Only four remain on the roster today: Jaycee Horn, Chuba Hubbard, Tommy Tremble, and Brady Christensen. Two of them signed significant contract extensions with the team (Horn, Hubbard) while the other two (Tremble, Christensen) received short-term deals that aren't cap-heavy. It's worth mentioning the conditions these guys entered the league under Matt Rhule's second year and Scott Fitterer's first. A ton of players were brought in that year, including a long snapper who didn't make the team… instead of Trey Smith, who just happens to be the Chiefs' starting guard (hey... to be fair to Thomas Fletcher, he did have a fun draft day phone call). These four survived Rhule and Reich and were seen as valuable enough under the first-year combo of Morgan and Canales to be rewarded with second deals. Jaycee Horn (Round 1, Pick 8.) Horn has all of the traits of a true CB1: elite footwork, physicality, and the ability to mirror WR1s... but his biggest challenge has been staying on the field. He's never finished an entire season, though to be fair, it's been rumored he wouldn’t have been shut down for the final two weeks of last season had the team been in playoff contention. He's got just 37 career games played over four seasons (with 15 of those coming in Morgan/Canales' Year 1). The team gambled on his production after seeing that not only can he lock down WR1s in man or match quarters, but he can also be dependable in a heavy cover-3 zone scheme like what the Panthers ran last season. With the recent free agent and draft additions made this offseason, expect Jaycee to go back to eliminating WR1s from the game rather than shutting down a third of the field like he was recently asked to do. Chuba Hubbard (Round 4, Pick 126) Originally seen as a depth pick with linear speed, Hubbard has outperformed expectations and emerged as the team's RB1 over the past couple of years. His 2023 breakout laid the foundation, but in 2024 he cemented his role as the lead back, showing much-improved vision, contact balance, and decisiveness in outside zone. He finished top-10 in missed tackles forced and yards after contact per attempt, all while holding his own in pass protection and producing on screens. Chuba doesn't have elite burst or wiggle, but he's carved out a spot as the leader and tone-setter in the run game. Not bad value for a Day 3 selection—positional value be damned. Tommy Tremble (Round 3, Pick 83) Tremble has been the kind of player every team needs but few talk about: dependable, physical, and quietly versatile. When he was drafted, he was already known for his blocking chops and has steadily improved as a receiver. He experienced his most complete season in 2024 with a 79.3% catch rate, 10.2 yards per reception, no drops, and a 108.9 passer rating when targeted. Not only that, he's been a consistent special teamer since coming into the league. He's a natural fit as a TE/FB hybrid in 12 and 13 personnel, consistently handling the dirty work in both run and pass situations. Brady Christensen (Round 3, Pick 70) BC has played all over the line both as a starter and as a back-up. We haven't seen the "short arms" come up as often as Rhule was worried about, especially against ATL and WAS where he logged over 100 snaps at center and posted his best grades of the year (76.0 OVR, 73.8 PBL, 75.8 RBLK vs. ATL; 85.2 OVR, 72.9 PBLK, 86.0 RBLK vs. WAS). While his overall pass-blocking grade (56.1) and lack of a consistent position might mean that he's the perfect OL6 rather than a long-term starter, he's been dependable when given his opportunities.
    • Fees nowadays are ridiculous. After purchasing concert tickets for my son’s 18th birthday and paying the rest of our HHI trip with 3 other families, I’m shocked at how much they are. Honestly, it’s grand theft. Some is taxes but in a world where everything is electronic, fees should be cheaper. Electrons don’t cost 10-30% of the event.
×
×
  • Create New...