Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

compensatory picks


hdevonxz

Recommended Posts

1st, you have to have a net loss of free agents from the year before. This year's comp picks are from 2008. So, you can't cut many people (i.e., you can't replace them because you replace them with FAs, but the people you cut aren't people you "lose"). Also, RFAs, franchise/transition tag players don't count.

Then, compensatory picks are given out based on the value of the contract and based on the production of the player. There's no rhyme or reason for it. There's never been more than a 3rd given at a time, but some teams receive multiple picks for various situations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1st, you have to have a net loss of free agents from the year before. This year's comp picks are from 2008. So, you can't cut many people (i.e., you can't replace them because you replace them with FAs, but the people you cut aren't people you "lose"). Also, RFAs, franchise/transition tag players don't count.

Then, compensatory picks are given out based on the value of the contract and based on the production of the player. There's no rhyme or reason for it. There's never been more than a 3rd given at a time, but some teams receive multiple picks for various situations.

I believe the performances of the FAs lost vs the ones picked up also play a role in this. But yeah, it's some formula we mere mortals never get to see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is a complex solution based on several factors. But the first factor is that you can not sign more free agents than you lost. Even if you lost 2 big time players and only signed 4 scrubs, you still get no picks in the next draft. We signed a ton of free agents last year: Vincent, Gibson, Hackett, Johnson, Wesley, Walker and perhaps Mark Jones counts also although he might not since he was signed so late. Therefore I doubt we lost more than that who wound up being signed by other teams.

So I doubt we get picks in this draft.

The highest I have seen picks awarded for players being lost is a third round pick BUT if we lose Peppers or Gross and some other free agents totaling say...4 that are re-signed by other teams, and we sign 5 free agents, we probably miss out on compensatory picks next year even if all 5 of our new guys turn out to be scrubs. It just works that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Bryce hasn't done a single thing to prove he deserves to have his option picked up.  I'd have less of an issue with us declining the option and bringing him back as the starter next year than I would have us picking up that option, as that means he's on our cap books for the next 2 years instead of 1, even if he's cut before year 5. Tua threw for 3,500 yards with a 25-8 TD-INT ratio in just 13 starts the year before they picked up his option, and then threw for over 4,600 yards before they gave him his extension. Kyler threw for 3,722, 3,971, and 3,787 in 16, 16, and 14 games (while rushing for 544, 819, and 423 in those seasons) before they picked up his option and then signed him to an extension before year 4. Jones threw for 3,200 yards with a 3-1 TD-INT ratio with another 700 yards and 7 TDs rushing in year 4 before they signed him to his extension. Bryce has thrown for 2,877 and 2,400 yards in 16 and 12 starts his two seasons, while being on pace for 3,128 yards in a 17 game season so far this year. The closest comparison to any of them was Jones, who while he's turned it around this year, is someone I think everyone can agree was not a player who deserved that extension after that season. If people think those other QB's having their options picked up and/or given extensions were a mistake, in what world can you look at what Bryce has done and make any rational argument for him even being brought back as our starter next year, let alone also picking up his option that would cost us about $27 million fully guaranteed.
    • I don't think we would actually play Hooker but hopefully we also just don't see. I don't view Dalton/Bryce as a worse option than Winston/Howell. I just think we disagree on this specific subject is all.
    • I guarantee tepper would fire him if we lost out and he’d be justified 
×
×
  • Create New...