Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The John Fox Mentality. Cmon


Panthro

Recommended Posts

For me, I understand the concern some have of Cam's mechanics and the offensive style he played in college.

What I cannot understand is this knock that he's not mentally tough enough to play at the next level. The kid won every game he could at the top level of college football in the toughest league in the country, and he did it under more scrutiny than any player in the history of the game.

To me that's worth something.

I am not knocking Cam on that. I was just thinking about how Jake got fired up and made himself and the team better, despite John Fox and his ho-hum attitude. Can Cam be the same way?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bust franchise QBs sets franchises back many years, bust lineman or skill players outside of QB sets back teams only a couple.

I pay for PSLs and I want a winning product. If that means going safe, so be it. I don't want to see a losing product while a rookie QB, especially a raw one like Cam, tries to find his way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We're in an almost unique position in the NFL. We had a team last year that was simultaneously undergoing a massive change in on-the-field leadership, working for a lame-duck coaching staff, and starting way too many rookies at skill positions. Moreover, we were almost too sensitive to the injury bug (possibly because the coaches were leaving anyway, so the FO got risk-averse). And we stunk it up big-time on the field.

If you go back through the last ten years, you'll be hard-pressed to find any team taking in the top three that's anywhere near as talented as we are. Maybe the Chargers in 2004, but most of the teams spent a couple years earning the right to pick at the top (take a look at how often Detroit and Cleveland are in there). I would argue that even without a pick, we're young enough and talented enough to get back to the middle of the pack this year.

And because of that, there's never been a better time to take a risk. It's not like we'll end up in Raider territory if Newton is a bust, it just means we swung for the fences and missed.

Very much agree, except the only thing that will guarantee us being back here next year is if we maintain the status quo at the QB spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bust franchise QBs sets franchises back many years, bust lineman or skill players outside of QB sets back teams only a couple.

I pay for PSLs and I want a winning product. If that means going safe, so be it. I don't want to see a losing product while a rookie QB, especially a raw one like Cam, tries to find his way.

Could you explain the difference between many years ve a couple years?

Also how does passing on a franchise QB factor in? The Panthers have never had a franchise QB...ever. 0 Super Bowls.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bust franchise QBs sets franchises back many years, bust lineman or skill players outside of QB sets back teams only a couple.

I pay for PSLs and I want a winning product. If that means going safe, so be it. I don't want to see a losing product while a rookie QB, especially a raw one like Cam, tries to find his way.

A rookie pay scale will go a long way into being able to take chances from time to time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could you explain the difference between many years ve a couple years?

Also how does passing on a franchise QB factor in? The Panthers have never had a franchise QB...ever. 0 Super Bowls.

and there are franchise QBs who have never sniffed playing in the Super Bowl....yet Jake Delhomme has

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could you explain the difference between many years ve a couple years?

Also how does passing on a franchise QB factor in? The Panthers have never had a franchise QB...ever. 0 Super Bowls.

Like 2 years vs. 5 years. A team is much sooner to throw in a towel on a WR, DB or lineman than a QB.

We have zero Superbowl wins, but so do a lot of teams since 1995. Don't forget we were a kick out of bounds away from one with a jouneyman that nobody outside of New Orleans or Charlotte knew about.

There are plenty of franchise QBs out there with out a Superbowl win. Go ahead with a laundry list of one timers, but the only two really successful ones have been Brady (6th rounder) and Big Ben (not top ten selection).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like 2 years vs. 5 years. A team is much sooner to throw in a towel on a WR, DB or lineman than a QB.

We have zero Superbowl wins, but so do a lot of teams since 1995. Don't forget we were a kick out of bounds away from one with a jouneyman that nobody outside of New Orleans or Charlotte knew about.

There are plenty of franchise QBs out there with out a Superbowl win. Go ahead with a laundry list of one timers, but the only two really successful ones have been Brady (6th rounder) and Big Ben (not top ten selection).

When did the Raiders select Russell and What was the Raider record last year?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, they brought in a group of veteran QBs and cut their losses much earlier than most teams would have. Hell, even Al Davis could tell he was a piece of poo. The Raiders sucked for a few years while the Russell experiment was going on, right?

Keep trying.

By the way, I'm not against a rookie QBs though it may seem that way, just this year's group.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, they brought in a group of veteran QBs and cut their losses much earlier than most teams would have. Hell, even Al Davis could tell he was a piece of poo. The Raiders sucked for a few years while the Russell experiment was going on, right?

Keep trying.

By the way, I'm not against a rookie QBs though it may seem that way, just this year's group.

So a team that many consider the worst run team in the NFL recovered pretty quickly...thanks.

Explain how this group is any different then Stafford, Sanchez, and Freeman. All of which we would be happy to have as our QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...