Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Drafting an "NFL ready QB" Vs one that "Needs work"....


AKPantherFan

Recommended Posts

:lol: Ben "led" his team to Superbowls. His team hates him he just happens to be on a team with a top 2 defense, a great running game, and very good receivers.

Wow... that sounds like the Panthers a couple years ago... except without franchise quality QB play.

Gee... I wonder what would be a good way to correct that?

Hmm... I don't think you can figure that one out chuckles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:lol: Ben "led" his team to Superbowls. His team hates him he just happens to be on a team with a top 2 defense, a great running game, and very good receivers.

If Ben Roethlisberger isn't a good enough QB for you then no QB will ever have a chance to meet your expectations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A top 2 defense?

Good WRs?

What Panthers have you been watching?

"Like" does not mean "identical".

Our team's MO has been Defense, running.... then passing. Our offense has always lacked a solid franchise QB... even with Delhomme under center... we've never had that "one" QB to build around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Ben Roethlisberger isn't a good enough QB for you then no QB will ever have a chance to meet your expectations.

I put him in the good category right below the elite 5-6 QBs in the league, but let's not pretend he was the only reason they've been to three superbowls.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Like" does not mean "identical".

Our team's MO has been Defense, running.... then passing. Our offense has always lacked a solid franchise QB... even with Delhomme under center... we've never had that "one" QB to build around.

Just because it's our style doesn't mean we've done it anywhere near the level of success of the Steelers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I originally hated the Miller deal but with the cap projected to rise nearly $10M next season the Canes struck some pretty good deals between Miller and Ehlers. Most of the team is locked in for the next few years. Nikishin will need an extension probably in the $6M AAV range. And Blake will need one if we don’t move him. Personally I’d move Blake, picks, and any prospect not named Nikishin/Nadeau/Artamonov for McTavish as I don’t see any any of the big time players moving teams next year. Realistically the Hurricanes should just target Gustavsson next year to fix the goal tending issue. But I’m all for moving Blake, picks, and prospects for McTavish this year. Ehlers - Aho - Jarvis Svechnikov - McTavish - Stankoven Martinook - Staal - Carrier Hall - Kotkaniemi - Robinson Jost - Jankowski Slavin - Miller Nikishin - Chatfield Gostisbehere - Walker Reilly Andersen Kochetkov I’d do Blake, Felix-Unger-Sorum, and 27 2nd for McTavish.
    • Very true on the length but stuff like this is never where we shine. We aren’t a good team at drafting.
    • Homerism aside, the more I see from Dan, the more impressed I am.  His player evaluation instincts. Last year his 2 premier FA signings, Hunt and Lewis COMPLETELY changed the line and I have a feeling his success in choosing blue chip guys will continue.  Look at the panthers’s rep for FA signings in the past. By and large, it’s been guys 1 year past their prime who had an injury and suckered our GM in to a crippling contract. We never get nice things. When was the last time this team signed 2 young blue chip studs  in the same offseason to contracts worthy of their impact? Ever?  Im telling y’all, players respect and trust Morgan. 
×
×
  • Create New...