Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Serious Sex Question


Darth Biscuit

Recommended Posts

This is what I have told guys before.

There is no way you can be "bad" at it.

Stick your face down there and move your tongue around some and I'll tell you whats good and whats not.

that's it. not really much more to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In general? I'd probably say men are worse.

i'd say women. for men its easy. not like there is a lot to flickin' your tongue really fast, and maybe inserting some fingers while your at it.

women have to be in control of their gag reflex though to be good at it IMO. and it seems some don't know about spitting and using their hands at the same time. its like they've never watched a porn, or even the instructional videos on the internet. before anyone makes a joke I found them and showed them to a girl. was like, "this is how you do it. pay attention." that didn't go over well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

similar for me, but she was a triple athlete and Morehead scholar. no pun intended.

:cheers2:

:lol:

Similar story here... I was sixteen and had borrowed my dad's truck with the bench seat... fun times.

HAHAHAHAHAH omg. sorry I dont mean to laugh at your misfortune but damn that had to be awkward.

don't worry, it is funny to look back on.. I can't say that was the last time either. and yes, it's kind of awkward. and not so much for me, but for her.. I feel awkward for her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I played flute and piccolo ... where I learned to triple-tongue. ;)

well, I already gave you rep.. so ...

:lurk5:

This is what I have told guys before.

There is no way you can be "bad" at it.

Stick your face down there and move your tongue around some and I'll tell you whats good and whats not.

that's it. not really much more to it.

key words.. I hate when girls are scared to communicate what they like. it should be standard practice, every girl has their thing they like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i'd say women. for men its easy. not like there is a lot to flickin' your tongue really fast, and maybe inserting some fingers while your at it.

women have to be in control of their gag reflex though to be good at it IMO. and it seems some don't know about spitting and using their hands at the same time. its like they've never watched a porn, or even the instructional videos on the internet. before anyone makes a joke I found them and showed them to a girl. was like, "this is how you do it. pay attention." that didn't go over well.

To be good, it takes a certain skill set for both men and women. I disagree with Boo (and maybe you) that all a guy has to do is stick his tongue down there and move it around. That's just the basics, and sometimes the basics are so boring as to not be effective. A truly skilled man does so much more than that. I can say that only a few of the many men I've been with are truly skilled in that area ... they do look at it merely as a way of "warming" me up, when if they took their time and got into a bit more, they would get so much more out of me in the long run. The few who know, have reaped the best rewards, and I don't mean merely "reciprocating."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I tolerate it. I would never say I loved it; by which I mean I would do it with no alterior motives. I do it because it's a prelude to something much better. Personally, I just find it boring. The whole time I'm doing it, I'm thinking, "Man, how much longer is this going to take?"

And reciprocation isn't much incentive for me, because I'm one of those odd cases where I don't really get off to that (Don't ask me why, I just think I'm incapable of getting off if she's not getting off). I'm a dyed in the wool copulation man.

I'm not a big fan of receiving oral either for multiple reasons.

Often it just gets too wet down there and it causes friction issues which reduces pleasure. It's hit or miss.

Also mentally I just don't like it as much. I like my sex rough and I prefer being pushed around and controlled If he lingers there to long then that mentality typically goes away.

I prefer it as short lived foreplay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not a big fan of receiving oral either for multiple reasons.

Often it just gets too wet down there and it causes friction issues which reduces pleasure. It's hit or miss.

Also mentally I just don't like it as much. I like my sex rough and I prefer being pushed around and controlled If he lingers there to long then that mentality typically goes away.

I prefer it as short lived foreplay.

Different strokes, as they say.

I like my sex a bit rough, too, on occasion ... receiving oral doesn't diminish that opportunity for me. Of course, a lot depends on the partner ... as with any kind of sexual activity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not a big fan of receiving oral either for multiple reasons.

Often it just gets too wet down there and it causes friction issues which reduces pleasure. It's hit or miss.

Also mentally I just don't like it as much. I like my sex rough and I prefer being pushed around and controlled If he lingers there to long then that mentality typically goes away.

I prefer it as short lived foreplay.

interesting. I am the opposite. But I have my reasons.

But being pushed around and controlled= awesome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He gets the blame because his role as the QB is to make plays, help the team score more points and elevate players around him. He does none of that. Just because he didn’t massively mess up doesn’t mean he wasn’t a reason for the loss. The bar some of you have for Bryce is incredibly low.
    • Yeah I was crying about this earlier in the year when we got to 6 wins. Equal number to Wilks.  We are still a QB away. 
    • Hey y'all, a topic that has been on my mind has always been the parallels between two of the best quarterbacks in the history of the NFC South and ultimately their place in history and how they are viewed moving forward through the rest of NFL history. These two quarterbacks as you might have guessed are their respective franchises greatest signal callers, Cam Newton and Matt Ryan.  Cam Newton (144 Games Started): 269 TDs (1.8 per contest), 123 INTs, Super Bowl Appearance, OROTY, MVP  Matt Ryan (234 Games Starter):  394 TDs (1.6 per contest), 183 INTs, Super Bowl Appearance, OROTY, MVP  Obviously on first glance, these are very similar players with identical top accomplishments. Let's zoom in a little bit on their surrounding talent. C Cam Newton top offensive producers:  Greg Olsen (TE) (9 Seasons) (3 Pro Bowls) Steve Smith Sr. (WR) (3 Seasons) (1 Pro Bowl) Matt Ryan top offensive producers:  Julio Jones (WR) (10 Seasons) (7 Pro Bowls)  Roddy White (WR) (8 Seasons) (4 Pro Bowls)  Tony Gonzalez (TE) (5 Seasons) (4 Pro Bowls)  Wow, quite the difference here. Through Cam's career his top option was Greg Olsen, who was one of the best tight ends of his generation and a real difference maker in an offense reliant on their quarterback making plays outside of structure. Newton post Steve Smith Sr was saddled with a revolving door of Chicken McNobodies at the receiver position and the offense had to be funneled through the tight end and running attack as Jericho Cotchery, Corey Brown, Jason Avant, Kelvin Benjamin, etc was not getting the job done. Ryan on the other hand was consistently surrounded with top level offensive weapons, including one of the best receivers and tight ends in the history of the game, thanks in part to an aggressive general manager who wanted to ensure they could maximize the arm talent of their franchise quarterback.  How about protection?  Cam Newton top offensive lineman: Jordan Gross (3 Seasons) (1 Pro Bowl)  Ryan Kalil (8 Seasons) (2 Pro Bowls) Andrew Norwell (4 Seasons)  Trai Turner (6 Seasons) (5 Pro Bowls) Matt Ryan top offensive lineman:  Jake Matthews (8 Seasons) (1 Pro Bowl)  Alex Mack (5 Seasons) (3 Pro Bowls)  Andy Levitre (3 Seasons)  Todd McLure (5 Seasons)  While Matt Ryan certainly had more consistency and high level talent on his offensive line, one could argue they had similar protection through the bulk of their career. Though one has to acknowledge some of the absolute dog water lineman that were trot out to protect Newton at his tackle spots post Jordan Gross retirement. Byron Bell, Mike Remmers, Matt Kalil, Chris Clark, Amini Silatolu, Nate Chandler, etc were all a collective pile of garbage save for two seasons from Remmers and a few splashes of brilliance from Michael Oher, Daryl Williams, and early career Taylor Moton.  Defense should be fairly simple.  Cam Newton defense average rank:  17th/32 Matt Ryan defense average rank:  18th/32  Honestly I was a bit surprised by this, I had thought Cam consistently had the better defenses, but when you look at the average it's shockingly close. While Newton did have the higher peaks of defense, Atlanta placed higher more consistently and only really faltered towards the end of Ryan's career. Both these players had on and off again defenses to rely on.  So what does all this mean?  1. I am bored at work  2. Cam Newton has the better body of work given the talent around him  While I am not sure either is necessarily a lock to get a gold jacket, it's undeniable that Newton carried his franchise on his back for the better part of his career and changed how quarterbacks are viewed as a whole. Newton became the blueprint for a new breed of signal caller, and Ryan is the standard that is set for pocket quarterbacks in the modern league. Both players deserve their kudos for what they did for their franchises and how they morphed their team's identity, but Newton I think was clearly the better of the NFC South quarterbacks, especially if he had remained as healthy as Ryan did. 
×
×
  • Create New...