Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The tenders will stay in place, right?


jtnc

Recommended Posts

Not necessarily. The owners haven't won yet. Currently players can't sign with other teams, so the tenders are meaningless for now. If they end up operating under 2010 rules, then you're right. The tenders will be in effect. If they agree on a new CBA, then it all depends on the new CBA (and I expect at most 4 years of RFA in the new CBA, so players like Deangelo would be UFAs).

So since the Owners won the tenders will stay in place and we could get something in return for anyone we lose in FA. Is this correct?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • You could see it on the ice. Rod benched his vodka loving ass in the middle of the year. 100 a liability. I don’t appreciate his time here.  fug him. I hope Boom kicks his ass when we play the sharks next year. 
    • I don't have anything to do with whatever he is claiming. Any quote about McCaffrey "hating" it here does not exist that I know of. I'm telling you the reality of the situation based on his family and himself. That he and his family wanted him there and they were thrilled that he was back in an area which his famous athlete father has deep ties to. At the end of the day he would rather be there. That's something you're going to have to reconcile with. And if this franchise stinks so bad and you like him so much well.... there's the door🚪
×
×
  • Create New...