Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Kemba available at #9?

C-A-T-S

By C-A-T-S,
in Charlotte Hornets

Recommended Posts

PanthersGuy28 Newbie

PanthersGuy28

Posted
Posted

I highly doubt both Leonard and Walker fall. I think Sacramento still takes Kemba at 7 if he's there even though they have really started liking Jimmer lately. I think there is a better chance Leonard falls, but if one of the two are there we definitely take him. I would actually rather have Kemba fall though, outstanding leader and is very clutch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Munch4455 Newbie

Munch4455

Posted
Posted

Undersized 2 guard that is going to be forced to play the point in the NBA, is a streaky shooter and not really an great distributor of the basketball. Sound like anyone we know?

Its easy to score points in college, especially if you shoot a ton of shots a game(43% from the field last year, 23 PPG). At the 2 he would get dominated by larger defenders. The Very Best case scenario is that Kemba is Ben Gordon 2.0(Even though I think Ben Gordon was a little more athletic than Kemba is coming out of college).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BOBCATS_BALL! Newbie

BOBCATS_BALL!

Posted
Posted

Would be hard to pass him up, but like what was said above, he's Ben Gordon 2.0.

If he is anything close to a young Ben Gordon, you take him at 9, no doubt.

Gordon was a stud before he left Chicago back in the mid 2000s. He averaged in the low 20s and high teens ppg each year for the Bulls.

Do you honestly think this Bobcats team, which is pretty much the worst offensive team in the NBA, doesnt need someone who can score points????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • frankw
      Mike Tomlin stepping down as HC of the Steelers

      By frankw · Posted

      We've never seen them outside of the structure of two very well ran organizations I'll give you that. And yes they are long in the tooth. I do think they are more than capable of getting a franchise turned around in short term capacity though. They are by no means a long term solution.
    • Joe Bear
      Your Feelings on Bryce Through 3 Seasons? (POLL)

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      You're not making a good-faith argument by blaming literally everything on the quarterback when the defense gave him a fat 38 seconds to overcome its ineptitude, but it seems you're dead-set on blaming him for any problem the team encounters. In this case, it's not warranted. Sometimes it is. But he had no time to throw (pressured on 46% of all dropbacks, an insane amount) and that's simply not all his fault -- particularly when they rush 4 or less and are in the backfield in 1.5s or less. Should we have gotten more than 0 yards? Sure! But he hit a WR in the hands on fourth down and it was dropped. Not his fault. He missed one throw on second down but I attribute first down to a bad play call and third down to poor pass protection. I would've called some quick slants, personally, but it really seems you're saying: - playcalling: Bryce's fault - poor pass protection: Bryce's fault - defensive choking away a lead: Bryce's fault, not the defense - Horn dropping a pass: Bryce's fault It's a great way to garner support on here, because when it comes to Bryce, logic takes such a backseat to context that it's not even in the same vehicle. Plenty of games can be attributed to him. Can't take anyone seriously who solely blames him for that one. 
    • DeAngelo Beason
      Your Feelings on Bryce Through 3 Seasons? (POLL)

      By DeAngelo Beason · Posted

      I don't see how you can logically make that argument when the team beat two of the top teams in the entire league during the regular season.  Now imagine the additional games we would have won against absolute tip top competitors like SF and SEA had we had a professional QB.  You can throw any random stat at the problem you want, but the proof is in the pudding.  We all watched it live.  This roster would have produced 13 wins (wins against SF and SEA, two wins against NO, and would have swept the Bucs) and (almost certainly) a #1 seed with a remotely competent QB.  Those were not games where we needed an all star performance to win.  Those were games where a very, very modest stat line would have netted us an easy win. Nearly every measurable aspect of the team would have been significantly improved with a competent QB.
×
×
  • Create New...